17.7 C
London
Sunday, November 8, 2026
secret satire society
Home Blog Page 395

Experts: Theresa May Condemning UK to EU Triple Lock Deal

0

Not only has the previous head of MI6 condemned Theresa May’s capitulation deal to the EU, but analysts have discovered a triple lock system that will tie the UK to the EU forever and will be impossible to extricate itself from.

The EU’s triple lock guarantee is so constructed that never again will Brussels be troubled by anymore aspirations of democracy in the United Kingdom. Parliament has one last chance to escape complete EU imprisonment – and it is now, by rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement in its entirety. Unfortunately, because of Theresa May’s collusion with Labour, and the traitors in her own Cabinet, she may very well succeed in putting through her disastrous BRINO Brexit deal — a complete capitulation to Brussels.

The first lock: the bullshit transition period

The first lock is the transition period, which lasts until at least 2021. The UK must hand over an estimated £39 billion for nothing, be bound by EU law and take orders from an unelected Joint Committee operating under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. The EU27 will stall an equitable free trade agreement before the end of 2020 because the “future partnership” is set out in the Northern Ireland backstop, which kicks in automatically on 1st January 2021. Full ratification by all Member States is required before any such agreement can come into force. Achieving this in time to avoid entering the backstop is an impossibility, especially seeing how the EU negotiates. The Brexit bill will double to £80 billion and all donkey-Britain will get is a good shafting and a kick in the bollocks.

The second lock: the imaginary backstop

The backstop is intended to be inescapable and would take teams of lawyers decades to get out of at huge costs to the taxpayer. It is intended to prepare Britain for the final destination set out in the political declaration, as a permanent satellite state of the EU. The UK will thus be so worn down by years of hopeless negotiations, and its serfdom to the EU that it will decide to rejoin the EU as a full member – with greatly increased budget contributions and a whole swathe of new EU law to obey. The United States of Europe will have taken shape during our “wilderness years” using our £80 Billion, but without our political input. The EU army will also be in place, which the UK will be forced to join, and the Eurozone as well ditching the pound sterling.

The backstop will also carve out Northern Ireland as an EU province and set a border in the Irish Sea, it creates a partial “customs union” that requires us to implement EU trade tariffs and policy with no decision-making powers. Under highly restrictive “non-regression clauses”, the UK also agrees to implement all EU environmental, competition, state aid and tax harmonisation laws, with the unelected Joint Committee and the ECJ once again able to punish us for any perceived backsliding. British farmers will be locked into a subsidy regime well below support received by EU27 farmers, who nevertheless retain tariff-free access to the UK. British agriculture would be reduced to nothing. It means the UK could not support British businesses, give ourselves a competitive edge in new technologies where we excel, strike independent trade deals or diverge in key policy areas such as goods regulations and tax. Free EU access to UK fisheries is set down as a marker for negotiation in the future “deal”.

The third lock: the “future one-sided partnership”

Anyone expecting the EU27 to give up the immense advantages they gain under the backstop is off their fucking rocker. Retaining tariff-free access to the UK market and effective control of UK trade and competition policy will have them salivating over their unlimited expense account statements. To ensure they reap the full benefit, there is the third and final lock in the Withdrawal Agreement. Unless we agree to a “future partnership” as set out in the political declaration, the backstop will endure in perpetuity.

The Political Declaration replicates all the onerous “non-regression” clauses of the backstop and requires even more surrender of sovereignty via participation in and funding of the EU’s aerospace and defence programmes, free access to UK waters for EU fishermen, a full customs union and common trade policy, free movement by the backdoor under “mobility” clauses, EU control of UK agriculture via the state aid rules and in general full adherence to the acquis communautaire in all policy areas.

In other words, the UK is fucked, not only from within via traitors like Theresa May, Ollie Robbins, Philip Hammond, Anna Soubry, Ken Clarke, Oliver Letwin, the Cabinet, Dominic Grieve, John Bercow and the rest of the Remoaners, but the triple lock system will completely eviscerate any thought of future democracy or sovereignty for the UK.

Theologians: Jesus May Have Turned Water into Scotch Malt Whisky

0

Analysing a newly discovered parchment dating back to the Byzantine period, theologians have discovered that Jesus was also proficient in turning water into the finest Scotch malt whisky.

“It says here, the disciples at a wedding in Galilee were bored of the water into wine trick, so they asked Jesus if he had anything else up his sleeve. Jesus then turned a jug of water into an age-stated fine Glenfiddich lightly-peated 12-year-old single malt whisky. In those days ice was very hard to come by, so the boys instead drank the whisky straight,” Robert Kinnison, one of the theologians who presented the incredible find revealed.

To back up the new discovery many biblical scholars are stipulating the fact that if Jesus could turn water into wine, then why not anything else?

The newly found facts have been confirmed by the Holy See itself, and pope Francis interred the details of the holy whisky into the Vatican library on Tuesday.

In some instances, there are even calls for the King James bible to have additional passages added to include the new miracle that Jesus performed.

Bishop Montague Fortnoy, for Leicester Cathedral in Britain is even talking about changing the offering of wine into whisky.

“I (hic) wouldre..lik…to..(hic) …preshent another religiushh..(hic)…scuse meee!” the Bishop was quoted as saying before falling flat on his face.

Historians: Britain Now Under Feudal Dictatorship Led By Rogue MPs

0

The English are repeating history, as the feudal system of governance is reconstructed over the nation by treacherous English MPs who are aiding and abetting foreign powers to take over the once United Kingdom. In legal terms, this would be known as treason, however that legal precedent was outlawed by Tony Blair in 1998 by ‘repealing’ the 1795 Treason Act, as he made the necessary changes to entertain future treasonous events if they ever arose.

Feudalism is the name given to the system of government William I introduced to England after he defeated Harold at the Battle of Hastings. Feudalism became a way of life in Medieval England and remained so for many centuries.

William I is better known as William the Conqueror, and much like the EU took over Britain, so did he as a Frenchman take over the country in 1066. He had defeated the English army led by Harold but he had to gain control of all of England before he could be truly called king of England. He was a foreigner who had forced his way to London. He was not popular with the people of England and he had to use force to maintain his control on England.

William the Conqueror statue in Falaise in Normandie
France, the William the Conqueror statue in Falaise in Normandie

William was aided by treacherous barons, earls and other English traitors, much like the traitors in the Houses of Parliament today who have concocted plots against Brexit condemning Britain to an eternity under EU rule. Many English barons and earls gained even more power and riches by betraying their English compatriots.

William could not rule every part of the country himself – this was physically impossible. Not only was travel difficult and slow in the eleventh century, he was also still Duke of Normandy and he had to return to Normandy to maintain his control of this land in France. Therefore, he had to leave the country for weeks at a time. He needed a way of controlling England so that the people remained loyal.

William spent much of his time in London. He built his own castle – the Tower of London – so that it dominated the city. It was also his home while in London. He did not trust the builders of London – or English stone – so he used Norman craftsmen to do the skilled work while the English acted as labourers and he brought in from Caen (in France) the stone needed for what we now call the White Tower. He also built the first castle at Windsor. The motte is still visible. Castles represented a visible threat to the people of England. Soldiers were kept in them and they could be used against the English ‘scum’ should they cause trouble.

Warwick Castle
Built by William the Conqueror in 1068, Warwick Castle is a medieval castle in Warwick, the county town of Warwickshire, England. It sits on a bend on the River Avon.

However, he needed a way of actually governing the country. This was the Feudal System.

William divided up England into very large plots of land, much like the EU is doing in Britain today. These were ‘given’ to those noblemen who had fought bravely for him in battle. William argued that those noblemen who were willing to die in battle for him, would also be loyal to him. The land was not simply given to these nobles. They had to swear an oath of loyalty to William, they had to collect taxes in their area for him and they had to provide the king with soldiers if they were told to do so. In the eleventh century, a sworn oath on the Bible was a very important thing and one which few men would dare to break as it would condemn them to Hell. The men who got these parcels of land would have been barons, earls and dukes Within their own area, they were the most important person there. In the terms of the Feudal System, these men, the barons etc., were known as tenants-in-chief.

Even these pieces of land were large and difficult to govern.

The barons had to further divide up their land and these were ‘given’ to trusted Norman knights who had also fought well in battle. Each knight was given a segment of land to govern. He had to swear an oath to the baron, duke or earl, collect taxes when told to do so and provide soldiers from his land when they were needed.

William the Conqueror (1027-1087) on engraving from 1830. King of England during 1066-1087.

It was argued, that because they had sworn an oath to their baron, they had really sworn an oath to the king. These lords worked to maintain law and order. The people in their land – or manors – were treated harshly and there was always the constant threat of Norman soldiers being used against the English people wherever they lived. The lords had to do their job well as unsuccessful ones could be removed from their position. Their job was simple – keep the English people in their place — under the control of the Normans. Under the Feudal System, these men, the knights, were called sub-tenants.

Note that both groups were officially tenants – a word we associate with land that does not belong to you. Both all but rented out their land in that they had to provide money or services to the real owner of all land – William the Conqueror or the European Union in today’s parlance.

At the bottom of the ladder were the conquered English who had to do what they were told or pay the price for their disobedience.

The English were treated as scum and lower than dogs by the Norman conquerors, however those who accepted defeat and served the invaders were given some rights and privileges for betraying their own kind much like the treacherous MPs in parliament are given concessions by the EU.

There is no doubt that William’s rule was harsh, and so is Jean Claude Juncker’s. But he was a man who had conquered the country. He was not in England through the popular choice of the people and he had to ensure that he had full control over them at all times. He ensured that there were obvious signs of his power – the country saw the building of many Norman castles. He also knew what was owed to him because he ordered a survey of the whole country – the Domesday Book.

History thus moves in circles, as Britain enjoyed a brief time with some form of democracy from 1928 men and women over the age of 21 were granted the right to vote, and in 1969, this was lowered to the age of 18. It would be prudent to say that Britain has had a full democracy from 1969 to 2019 which is about 50 years.

Because of treacherous events by the likes of Dominic Grieve, John Bercow, and many others in parliament, democracy ended in Britain yesterday, 9 January 2019. We are now officially living under a feudal system once again. The English it seems have a fair history of letting others rule over them, and the EU is no different to William I.

Back to Feudalism: MPs Shutting Down Brexit is Undemocratic

0

The blatant disregard for the voter by MPs in parliament bypassing Brexit will come back to haunt the dishonourable members some day.

Under Britain’s parliamentary history, the institution of the House of Commons is one that is meant to serve the voter in a democracy, however with two parliamentary amendments that have been concocted much to the detriment of those who voted for Brexit, there is clear evidence that MPs are actively trying to stop Brexit every happening.

On June 23, 2016, in the biggest democratic vote ever seen in Britain’s history, 17.4 million people across the country voted to Leave the EU.

If Brexit is stopped from happening, there is a factual and legal base to presume that democracy does not exist in Britain today, and we are still living in a feudal system overlorded by MPs in the House of Commons and Lords in the House of Lords. These people have effectively taken over the role of the monarch within a feudal system, and the rest of the population are their serfs, with no say at all.

If the MPs have taken over the vote for Brexit, then they have effectively disavowed democracy in Britain.

This action by MPs is not only unconstitutional, undemocratic but is a direct insult to 17.4 million voters.

The consequences of these actions will naturally come to fruition, and with every undemocratic act, there will be a reaction one way or another. Whether it is massive civil disobedience, mass rioting, or deselection, the voter never forgets.

Remember this well, the voters never forget. These will be your last days in the House of Commons, as your names will have been registered, noted down, and listed.

The voter never forgets.

 

Obama Still in Control: Executive Order 13603 of March 16, 2012

0

Former President Obama is still effectively in control of much of the internal workings of the American governmental institutions and agencies, and this is why Donald Trump’s every move is stopped from the inside of government.

The national defence executive orders Obama introduced piecemeal from 2012-2016 put America into a state of pseudo martial law where all governmental departments answered directly to his socialist global ideology, and these executive laws have stood in place even under Trump’s reign.

This is why every move that Trump has made has been thwarted one way or another, because under Obama’s executive orders, governmental officials only answer to the globalist agenda and not to that of Trump, who is an American nationalist.

There is great fear now among the American media and governmental agencies that Trump will declare his own national emergency legal framework superseding the Obama executive orders which have caused so much friction in the Trump administration.

Trump’s address (02.00 GMT 9/1/19) was a forewarning and may finally create an opportunity for the president to overrule the Obama era directives, so that the people who have been in service to Obama within all governmental agencies can be removed, purged from the system. This ‘draining of the swamp’ would then allow a clear path for Trump to move forward with his plans and not hit a brick wall at every move.

Immediately from day one, every governmental agency within the United States was actively working against the president, and many governmental employees are actively seeking to undermine Trump’s decision making at every point.

By declaring a national emergency directive, much of Obama’s deep state will be rooted out and crushed. There are many in the U.S. media who may be arrested as well as those on Capitol Hill, for their acts of treason against the country and president.

One way or another, the Teflon Don will have his way, and this is why you have to sit back, break out the popcorn and Schlitz, because when the fireworks start, the real entertainment will commence in earnest.

 

The Sad Demise of CNN From News to Biased Opinion

0

CNN used to be the bastion of American news reporting, where it actually reported what was going on with actual journalistic facts. Sadly, it has now been denigrated to such a low level of so-called journalism that it is no longer seen as journalistic.

“CNN is now all about opinion, and this opinion is solely socialistic, extreme left wing rhetoric mixed in with half-truths and blatant political bias favouring one single party. CNN no longer reports the facts, it is a mere tool for socialist Americans to parrot their propaganda 24 hours a day into the heads of American citizens,” a former prominent CNN broadcaster revealed.

Shameful bias

How this media giant has fallen from the heyday of Ted Turner’s charge is precipitous. Looking from the outside inward, the former news service is blighted by extreme leftist stars like Don Lemon, a racist anti-white homosexual rights campaigner who decries anything that is not black supremacist or linked to the gay rights movement. His political ideology is so far to the left, it smacks of Soviet Marxist rhetoric, spewed out to the American audiences day in day out.

Even former host Larry King recently commented about the company he used to work for: “CNN stopped doing news a long time ago, they do Trump.”

The actual CNN reporting and journalism from within Iraq during the Gulf war, are decades behind and entrenched in history now, because if you watch the channel today, all you will get is anti-Trump discussions, and biased political anti-conservative anti-alternative media anti-free speech talk points more relevant to a Soviet communist state than America.

The blatantly biased political opinion of a news agency that used to report the news, is something that goes against all journalistic rules, and condemns CNN to become a mere echo chamber for socialistic rhetoric and propaganda.

As for Ted Turner, what happened to him? He recently commented on the demise of the channel by saying he’d prefer his old network had a more balanced agenda, “but that’s just one man’s opinion.”

 

Obama Oprah O’Rourke Ocasio – Why Socialist Americans Love ‘O’ So Much

0

Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Beto O‘Rourke, Ocasio-Cortez, these are all darlings of the socialist democrat party in America who all have something in common, the letter ‘o’.

What is it about the letter ‘o’ that is so endearing to the socialists and their dream of turning America into a pseudo-communist socialist state resembling Venezuela?

We asked Democrat party official Oona Menendez, the same question.

“Why is the letter ‘o’ so important for Democrat politicians, especially regarding elections?”

She replied quite succinctly: “Candidates have a greater success with the letter ‘o’ in their name because it breeds familiarity. Like with an ‘o’ people immediately know they’re safe, they are guaranteed socialism or communism. We adopted the significance of ‘o’ after eight years of Barack Obama rule. He was the first big ‘o’ which denoted ‘change’ and he brought in much socialist and Marxist changes to America, which is sadly being eroded by the current president. ‘O’ also stands for the circle, inclusivity, globalism, and collectivism. The main reason though, as I mentioned before, is familiarity, because when a voter is about to tick the box on election day, all they have to look for is where the Os are. If you see an ‘o’ on the first or last name, that’s who you vote for — Democrat. It’s really as simple as that.”

We asked her where ‘Hillary’ fits into this?

“She doesn’t. Never has, never will.”

 

Golden Globes Red Carpet Extravaganza Wows Crowds

0

“Did you see those golden globes?” an excited reveller asks.

“Wow! Those are the most amazing golden globes I’ve seen in years. They deserve first prize,” another excited viewer reveals.

Globetastic Globes

Globes, globes, golden globes, globulating everywhere. Look left and you see globes, look right and even more globes, the globes are so astounding that it can hurt your neck from looking.

There’s something about Red Carpet globes though, because they have a certain je ne sais quoi, a certain class to them, they have been tastefully presented for the world to look at and admire their intrinsic beauty. There is certainly nothing tacky about these globes put on full display for the whole globe to see.

“Does it matter if the globes bounce a little or do you think stationary globes are more tasteful?” one commentator asks.

“Personally I prefer a delicate balance, maybe a little bounce, but it’s how the light hits the curve of the globes that matter most for me,” the friend answers eagerly.

This year’s Golden Globe awards leave no doubt that Hollywood breeds some of the best globes in the world. Golden Globe award watchers from all over the globe have congregated to check out globes, globes, and more globes.

golden globe awards

 

Nail Polish Picks for the Season

0

Make your nails look expensive this season. There is absolutely no way that you can be looking on point and have nails that make you look like you have been working at a farm. But if you have not really been paying attention to your nails this season then you have to.

This is the season when you take good care of your nails and show them off. The beautiful thing about nails is that they do not have a season. What are we talking about? Unlike legs when you say this season I’m not showing my legs because it is cold. I have to keep them warm. In as much as you might wear gloves, you cannot eat whilst you wear them. So at some point, you have to show them off.

Now without wasting much of your time. Have a read on what colours will never let you down. And will make your nails look like you have just won a million dollars jackpot from internet casinos.

Colour splash!

Have you ever tried military green? When we talk about colours that are not flashy but at the same time are modern and will make you feel elegant, then you have got the right colour. And people often make this mistake of wanting to decorate their nails. But what you have to know is that it doesn’t work with all nail colours only specific ones. With military green, leave it like that.

Hot pink is cute. But we feel that it doesn’t work on all nails but specific kinds. It will depend on the shape and also the length. But if you really want your nails to look glammed up then go for the Rhinestones as well. When put on the right way then you are guaranteed that you will be on the safe side.

Chrome is one of the currently popular types. You see the models at the best casinos online? Well, they use it to grab people’s attention. If you haven’t tried the chrome nails then you are definitely missing out. Whether it is in summer or winter whichever the season they will not let you down.

Modigliani Nude Paintings Now Considered Sexually Offensive by Google

0

The ever present insanity of Big Brother Google and its puritanical push to meddle with every step the Daily Squib takes is taking a toll on our patience.

Showcasing a masterpiece from renowned painter Modigliani is now deemed as sexual perversion by internet monopoly Google who threatened to disable our ads on the front page.

This sort of puritanical nonsense is possibly just another way of punishing the Squib on a constant basis but what is for certain, it is highly illogical and goes against any artistic sensibilities or reason.

The Modigliani nudes are world famous and displayed in art galleries worldwide, having said that, it is inconsistent with normal human behaviour to ban a nude painting of a woman because it is an artistic representation of the female form created by an artist.

It boggles the mind the amount of censorship that is being doled out on a constant basis on our site, and we can only suppose we are being specifically targeted by Google to thwart every operation we do. We cannot joke, we cannot display art, we cannot write satire, we cannot do anything anymore without being censored by the humourless, anti-art, anti-satire, anti-creativity company called Google.

This injustice, is of course not deemed as important by others, and the double standards reek of a witch hunt against satire sites like ours who have a different opinion, and dare to speak freely. Whilst Google allows other sites to display scenes of torture, violence, paedophilia and perverted sexual content, we simply displayed a painting of a Modigliani nude painting and were summarily punished.

There is a nefarious air about the level of censorship, that is certainly even more pervasive than was witnessed under Soviet Russia’s era of discontent or any dystopian nightmare scenario dreamed up by George Orwell.

As for Modigliani, what would he have said if his nudes were deemed as offensive. Naturally he would have spat in the face of his accusers, and called them a few well chosen names, before leaving in pure disgust.

Nu couché

(We have not posted a picture of the painting because it is deemed sexually offensive by Google but it can be viewed on the Wikipedia link above)

Known in English as Red Nude or Reclining Nude is a 1917 oil on canvas painting by the Italian artist Amedeo Modigliani. It is one of his most widely reproduced and exhibited paintings.

The painting was sold for a cool $170,405,000 at a Christie’s New York sale on 9 November 2015, a record for a Modigliani painting and placing it high among the most expensive paintings ever sold. The purchaser was the Chinese businessman Liu Yiqian.

The painting is one of a famous series of nudes that Modigliani painted in 1917 under the patronage of his Polish dealer Léopold Zborowski. It is believed to have been included in Modigliani’s first and only art show in 1917, at the Galerie Berthe Weill. Christie’s lot notes for their November 2015 sale of the painting observed that this group of nudes by Modigliani served to reaffirm and reinvigorate the nude as a subject of modernist art.

All we can say in pure disgust is one day we hope the ghost of Modigliani haunts you Google, and the robotic soulless pieces of detritus you have working for you censoring art and the Daily Squib.