Hundreds of online businesses are formed every day throughout the United Kingdom. Whether marketing t-shirts or selling the latest piece of technological hardware to a multinational corporation, the influence of this community is set to become more pronounced than ever before.
This is the very same reason why some of the marketing models of the past no longer hold any weight within the 21st century. While we are not necessarily recommending scrapping every single insight and notion, even the experts agree that entirely new approaches need to be taken in order to ensure ongoing success.
This is why it is a good idea to take a quick look at what many feel will be the predominant trend throughout 2019 and into the foreseeable future. Known as multi channel marketing, this approach is associated with a number of benefits that would not be possible with less effective alternatives.
Taking the Digital Bull by the Horns
Multi-channel sales and publicity is rather simple in terms of functionality. As you have likely already guessed from the title, it involves the ability to promote products or services across multiple digital channels as opposed to relying upon a single website alone. Some common examples here include:
– Blogs
– Social media pages
– Online retail hubs such as Amazon and eBay
– Standalone websites
– Sponsored content (such as Google AdWords).
– Affiliate marketing campaigns
Taken together, these solutions will result in a greater level of exposure and in turn, a higher return on investment (ROI). The key takeaway point here is that this approach can be managed from a centralised dashboard as opposed to being forced to monitor multiple channels at the same time. It should therefore be clear to understand why multi-channel advertising campaigns are here to stay and yet, this represents only part of the solution.
All Part of a Bigger Picture
Multi-channel tactics will only work if they are used in synergy with other strategies. For example, clients expect the associated content to be focused around their needs as opposed to being presented with generic texts. In terms of email campaigns, the same holds true. It is important that the offers and discounts reflect the interests of the recipient.
This is why analytics will have to come into play even more than ever before. Buying habits, seasonal sales figures, client feedback and which products have proven to be the most popular should be used to determine the direction of current and future marketing strategies.
The good news is that there are now many third-party e-commerce platforms such as Shopify Plus which are able to provide these and many other services to the end user.
Little previous knowledge is needed and they can be implemented within a very short period of time. Clarity and insight are both critical for any company that wishes to enjoy success in the coming year. Thankfully, there are now more tools at the disposal of the entrepreneur than ever before.
On Tuesday, Theresa May will present her Brexit In Name Only deal which will make Britain worse off than staying in the EU.
The Theresa May BRINO deal is a complete capitulation to Brussels which will include a payment to the EU of over £80 Billion of taxpayers money which could have been used on Britain instead, but will now be sucked into the EU money hole, either to furnish profligate Greek debt or the expense accounts of unelected eurocrats.
On the other hand, there is also a Remainer plot headed by MP Dominic Grieve, and John Bercow to completely bulldoze the Brexit vote and cancel Brexit. This plot conceived by those who do not value democracy or the vote of the people, or Britain, will cause a constitutional crisis and public discontent for thirty to forty years. The riots will be ongoing causing massive destruction.
There is also the option of a clean Brexit, where Britain would not have to pay £80 billion to Brussels, would trade under WTO rules, take back sovereign control of parliament from Brussels, be able to make our own laws, and govern ourselves. This Clean Brexit, also known as No Deal has been vilified by the traitors and undemocratic MPs who are fighting against Britain’s interests from the inside. It has also been tainted by Project Fear by the UK’s deep state who are in line with the Brussels hierarchy.
Theresa May’s deal is no different to the UK staying in the EU, and could go through parliament because she has made deals with Labour remainers who are sympathetic to her cause, and have been bribed someway or another.
Our conclusion is that any deal other than a Clean Brexit is not acceptable.
After seven resignations of royal staff to the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle in less than two months due to her extreme demanding behaviour, the palace has come up with a novel solution to the problem.
“We have acquisitioned the help of a company in Silicon Valley to develop an AI robot that will be able to cope with the numerous demands from Meghan Markle. We hope to have the prototype ready for palatial duties by March,” a senior palace aide told the BBC on Monday.
Royal commentator Bartholomew Montague, has revealed a huge problem with the new implant into the Windsor family.
“This is what happens when you effectively bring someone in from the ghetto into royal circles. They have not been brought up in the proper manner, are lowly of birth, have no understanding of British sensibilities, let alone royal protocol. The American, Meghan is as common as they come, one only has to look at her ghastly family. Prince Harry frankly has taken the royal family back to the stone age with his choice of bride, and should be punished. Imagine picking a bride even more common than Kate Middleton, we thought it an impossibility. So what if she gives great fellatio, he could have found a dozen actual princesses across Europe who can do the job just as well.”
The royal court is already reeling with rumours of rifts between Meghan and Kate Middleton, and even the two brothers have had a wedge put between them.
“This stinks to high heaven. All the staff are leaving and this is why we have had to go to extreme measures by requesting a company in Silicon Valley design a robot to put up with the commoner’s ridiculous demands,” another disgusted royal aide revealed.
The robot will be able to process as many as 450 demands per minute, which should be more than enough for Meghan, however the software can be adjusted to include more if the need arises.
The robot named ‘Jeeves’ was temporarily introduced for a week into Meghan’s new Windsor home last week however blew up after 45 minutes when its circuits could not take anymore demands. The company behind the robot is already rolling out Jeeves 6.0 and will eventually roll out a robot that will be able to function under the extreme conditions without exploding in a ball of flames.
Spitting on the graves of those who fought for our freedom in both world wars is now an establishment normality, as is throwing away thousands of years of sovereign rule in the British Isles. There is only one certainty in Britain today — treachery.
The MPs in parliament do not want to make their own laws anymore, they do not want to bother with silly things like governing or making their own decisions. They would much rather let others rule over them and tell them to do things, much like clerks in an office.
The despondent reaction of parliamentarians to adopting a role as a Vichy government to foreign invaders is a symptom of the times we are living in now. No one really gives a flying fuck about their own nation, this is why you have millions of people selling out their own country to an unelected soviet system like the EU.
The low-information ill informed Remoaners are only concerned about their ability to take cheap package holidays to Benidorm or to keep their mobile phone roaming charges so they can download their favourite reality show on the beach. This is the extent of their knowledge about what is at stake when the Eu Referendum was called. These illiterate EU zombies, NCPs, all follow the same lines, hold the same placards and bleat out the same Marxist mantras as they march to protest against freedom in the streets. Some don’t even know why they are marching, they are merely following, and obeying other people.
There is no one left to spearhead a real run for Brexit. Boris is off balls deep in some young filly’s cum box, and is naturally too preoccupied in keeping up the pace in his daily and nightly incursions ploughing deep into his new tight temptresses immaculately shaven meat pocket. Who can blame him, one only has to turn on any news program and all you have is a collective sound of remoaning, these are the only people given air space? Anyone else who dares to even speak of freedom, is immediately shut down and ushered out the backdoor.
One can easily surmise that Britain is no longer a nation of innovators, looking outward towards the globe, but a bunch of fucking cowards, who seem to enjoy their imprisonment. The door was left wide open in the prison, the sunlight touched their faces, but they were too scared of venturing out, they were institutionalised, too indoctrinated in EU Marxist ideology, they instead stayed where they were, transfixed as the door slowly closed once again.
What hope do we have when we have a Remoaner PM, who has thwarted and delayed every opportunity to leave, an insipid pustule so morose in her nature that her cowardice and treason are second to nature?
Maybe it is part of the British psyche now, to be shit upon, to enjoy their beatings, their masochistic pleasure derived from daily humiliation.
There is no fight left now, only apathy, only cowardice, and a resilient entrenched nature to do nothing.
“If they spit in our faces, we lick it up, if they tell us to bend over, we bend over and take it up the arse,” a Remoaner happily opined at the relief that there will be no aspirations of freedom, sovereignty or democracy in Britain ever again.
It is safe to say that World War I and II were fought for absolutely nothing, all those people died for absolutely nothing, because Britain lost both wars in reality, they won mere battles, but not the war, because the EU and Germany had the last laugh.
Britain now means nothing, it’s just another piece of shit zone in the EU.
Not only has the previous head of MI6 condemned Theresa May’s capitulation deal to the EU, but analysts have discovered a triple lock system that will tie the UK to the EU forever and will be impossible to extricate itself from.
The EU’s triple lock guarantee is so constructed that never again will Brussels be troubled by anymore aspirations of democracy in the United Kingdom. Parliament has one last chance to escape complete EU imprisonment – and it is now, by rejecting the Withdrawal Agreement in its entirety. Unfortunately, because of Theresa May’s collusion with Labour, and the traitors in her own Cabinet, she may very well succeed in putting through her disastrous BRINO Brexit deal — a complete capitulation to Brussels.
The first lock: the bullshit transition period
The first lock is the transition period, which lasts until at least 2021. The UK must hand over an estimated £39 billion for nothing, be bound by EU law and take orders from an unelected Joint Committee operating under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. The EU27 will stall an equitable free trade agreement before the end of 2020 because the “future partnership” is set out in the Northern Ireland backstop, which kicks in automatically on 1st January 2021. Full ratification by all Member States is required before any such agreement can come into force. Achieving this in time to avoid entering the backstop is an impossibility, especially seeing how the EU negotiates. The Brexit bill will double to £80 billion and all donkey-Britain will get is a good shafting and a kick in the bollocks.
The second lock: the imaginary backstop
The backstop is intended to be inescapable and would take teams of lawyers decades to get out of at huge costs to the taxpayer. It is intended to prepare Britain for the final destination set out in the political declaration, as a permanent satellite state of the EU. The UK will thus be so worn down by years of hopeless negotiations, and its serfdom to the EU that it will decide to rejoin the EU as a full member – with greatly increased budget contributions and a whole swathe of new EU law to obey. The United States of Europe will have taken shape during our “wilderness years” using our £80 Billion, but without our political input. The EU army will also be in place, which the UK will be forced to join, and the Eurozone as well ditching the pound sterling.
The backstop will also carve out Northern Ireland as an EU province and set a border in the Irish Sea, it creates a partial “customs union” that requires us to implement EU trade tariffs and policy with no decision-making powers. Under highly restrictive “non-regression clauses”, the UK also agrees to implement all EU environmental, competition, state aid and tax harmonisation laws, with the unelected Joint Committee and the ECJ once again able to punish us for any perceived backsliding. British farmers will be locked into a subsidy regime well below support received by EU27 farmers, who nevertheless retain tariff-free access to the UK. British agriculture would be reduced to nothing. It means the UK could not support British businesses, give ourselves a competitive edge in new technologies where we excel, strike independent trade deals or diverge in key policy areas such as goods regulations and tax. Free EU access to UK fisheries is set down as a marker for negotiation in the future “deal”.
The third lock: the “future one-sided partnership”
Anyone expecting the EU27 to give up the immense advantages they gain under the backstop is off their fucking rocker. Retaining tariff-free access to the UK market and effective control of UK trade and competition policy will have them salivating over their unlimited expense account statements. To ensure they reap the full benefit, there is the third and final lock in the Withdrawal Agreement. Unless we agree to a “future partnership” as set out in the political declaration, the backstop will endure in perpetuity.
The Political Declaration replicates all the onerous “non-regression” clauses of the backstop and requires even more surrender of sovereignty via participation in and funding of the EU’s aerospace and defence programmes, free access to UK waters for EU fishermen, a full customs union and common trade policy, free movement by the backdoor under “mobility” clauses, EU control of UK agriculture via the state aid rules and in general full adherence to the acquis communautaire in all policy areas.
In other words, the UK is fucked, not only from within via traitors like Theresa May, Ollie Robbins, Philip Hammond, Anna Soubry, Ken Clarke, Oliver Letwin, the Cabinet, Dominic Grieve, John Bercow and the rest of the Remoaners, but the triple lock system will completely eviscerate any thought of future democracy or sovereignty for the UK.
Analysing a newly discovered parchment dating back to the Byzantine period, theologians have discovered that Jesus was also proficient in turning water into the finest Scotch malt whisky.
“It says here, the disciples at a wedding in Galilee were bored of the water into wine trick, so they asked Jesus if he had anything else up his sleeve. Jesus then turned a jug of water into an age-stated fine Glenfiddich lightly-peated 12-year-old single malt whisky. In those days ice was very hard to come by, so the boys instead drank the whisky straight,” Robert Kinnison, one of the theologians who presented the incredible find revealed.
To back up the new discovery many biblical scholars are stipulating the fact that if Jesus could turn water into wine, then why not anything else?
The newly found facts have been confirmed by the Holy See itself, and pope Francis interred the details of the holy whisky into the Vatican library on Tuesday.
In some instances, there are even calls for the King James bible to have additional passages added to include the new miracle that Jesus performed.
Bishop Montague Fortnoy, for Leicester Cathedral in Britain is even talking about changing the offering of wine into whisky.
“I (hic) wouldre..lik…to..(hic) …preshent another religiushh..(hic)…scuse meee!” the Bishop was quoted as saying before falling flat on his face.
The English are repeating history, as the feudal system of governance is reconstructed over the nation by treacherous English MPs who are aiding and abetting foreign powers to take over the once United Kingdom. In legal terms, this would be known as treason, however that legal precedent was outlawed by Tony Blair in 1998 by ‘repealing’ the 1795 Treason Act, as he made the necessary changes to entertain future treasonous events if they ever arose.
Feudalism is the name given to the system of government William I introduced to England after he defeated Harold at the Battle of Hastings. Feudalism became a way of life in Medieval England and remained so for many centuries.
William I is better known as William the Conqueror, and much like the EU took over Britain, so did he as a Frenchman take over the country in 1066. He had defeated the English army led by Harold but he had to gain control of all of England before he could be truly called king of England. He was a foreigner who had forced his way to London. He was not popular with the people of England and he had to use force to maintain his control on England.
France, the William the Conqueror statue in Falaise in Normandie
William was aided by treacherous barons, earls and other English traitors, much like the traitors in the Houses of Parliament today who have concocted plots against Brexit condemning Britain to an eternity under EU rule. Many English barons and earls gained even more power and riches by betraying their English compatriots.
William could not rule every part of the country himself – this was physically impossible. Not only was travel difficult and slow in the eleventh century, he was also still Duke of Normandy and he had to return to Normandy to maintain his control of this land in France. Therefore, he had to leave the country for weeks at a time. He needed a way of controlling England so that the people remained loyal.
William spent much of his time in London. He built his own castle – the Tower of London – so that it dominated the city. It was also his home while in London. He did not trust the builders of London – or English stone – so he used Norman craftsmen to do the skilled work while the English acted as labourers and he brought in from Caen (in France) the stone needed for what we now call the White Tower. He also built the first castle at Windsor. The motte is still visible. Castles represented a visible threat to the people of England. Soldiers were kept in them and they could be used against the English ‘scum’ should they cause trouble.
Built by William the Conqueror in 1068, Warwick Castle is a medieval castle in Warwick, the county town of Warwickshire, England. It sits on a bend on the River Avon.
However, he needed a way of actually governing the country. This was the Feudal System.
William divided up England into very large plots of land, much like the EU is doing in Britain today. These were ‘given’ to those noblemen who had fought bravely for him in battle. William argued that those noblemen who were willing to die in battle for him, would also be loyal to him. The land was not simply given to these nobles. They had to swear an oath of loyalty to William, they had to collect taxes in their area for him and they had to provide the king with soldiers if they were told to do so. In the eleventh century, a sworn oath on the Bible was a very important thing and one which few men would dare to break as it would condemn them to Hell. The men who got these parcels of land would have been barons, earls and dukes Within their own area, they were the most important person there. In the terms of the Feudal System, these men, the barons etc., were known as tenants-in-chief.
Even these pieces of land were large and difficult to govern.
The barons had to further divide up their land and these were ‘given’ to trusted Norman knights who had also fought well in battle. Each knight was given a segment of land to govern. He had to swear an oath to the baron, duke or earl, collect taxes when told to do so and provide soldiers from his land when they were needed.
William the Conqueror (1027-1087) on engraving from 1830. King of England during 1066-1087.
It was argued, that because they had sworn an oath to their baron, they had really sworn an oath to the king. These lords worked to maintain law and order. The people in their land – or manors – were treated harshly and there was always the constant threat of Norman soldiers being used against the English people wherever they lived. The lords had to do their job well as unsuccessful ones could be removed from their position. Their job was simple – keep the English people in their place — under the control of the Normans. Under the Feudal System, these men, the knights, were called sub-tenants.
Note that both groups were officially tenants – a word we associate with land that does not belong to you. Both all but rented out their land in that they had to provide money or services to the real owner of all land – William the Conqueror or the European Union in today’s parlance.
At the bottom of the ladder were the conquered English who had to do what they were told or pay the price for their disobedience.
The English were treated as scum and lower than dogs by the Norman conquerors, however those who accepted defeat and served the invaders were given some rights and privileges for betraying their own kind much like the treacherous MPs in parliament are given concessions by the EU.
There is no doubt that William’s rule was harsh, and so is Jean Claude Juncker’s. But he was a man who had conquered the country. He was not in England through the popular choice of the people and he had to ensure that he had full control over them at all times. He ensured that there were obvious signs of his power – the country saw the building of many Norman castles. He also knew what was owed to him because he ordered a survey of the whole country – the Domesday Book.
History thus moves in circles, as Britain enjoyed a brief time with some form of democracy from 1928 men and women over the age of 21 were granted the right to vote, and in 1969, this was lowered to the age of 18. It would be prudent to say that Britain has had a full democracy from 1969 to 2019 which is about 50 years.
Because of treacherous events by the likes of Dominic Grieve, John Bercow, and many others in parliament, democracy ended in Britain yesterday, 9 January 2019. We are now officially living under a feudal system once again. The English it seems have a fair history of letting others rule over them, and the EU is no different to William I.
The blatant disregard for the voter by MPs in parliament bypassing Brexit will come back to haunt the dishonourable members some day.
Under Britain’s parliamentary history, the institution of the House of Commons is one that is meant to serve the voter in a democracy, however with two parliamentary amendments that have been concocted much to the detriment of those who voted for Brexit, there is clear evidence that MPs are actively trying to stop Brexit every happening.
On June 23, 2016, in the biggest democratic vote ever seen in Britain’s history, 17.4 million people across the country voted to Leave the EU.
If Brexit is stopped from happening, there is a factual and legal base to presume that democracy does not exist in Britain today, and we are still living in a feudal system overlorded by MPs in the House of Commons and Lords in the House of Lords. These people have effectively taken over the role of the monarch within a feudal system, and the rest of the population are their serfs, with no say at all.
If the MPs have taken over the vote for Brexit, then they have effectively disavowed democracy in Britain.
This action by MPs is not only unconstitutional, undemocratic but is a direct insult to 17.4 million voters.
The consequences of these actions will naturally come to fruition, and with every undemocratic act, there will be a reaction one way or another. Whether it is massive civil disobedience, mass rioting, or deselection, the voter never forgets.
Remember this well, the voters never forget. These will be your last days in the House of Commons, as your names will have been registered, noted down, and listed.
Former President Obama is still effectively in control of much of the internal workings of the American governmental institutions and agencies, and this is why Donald Trump’s every move is stopped from the inside of government.
The national defence executive orders Obama introduced piecemeal from 2012-2016 put America into a state of pseudo martial law where all governmental departments answered directly to his socialist global ideology, and these executive laws have stood in place even under Trump’s reign.
This is why every move that Trump has made has been thwarted one way or another, because under Obama’s executive orders, governmental officials only answer to the globalist agenda and not to that of Trump, who is an American nationalist.
There is great fear now among the American media and governmental agencies that Trump will declare his own national emergency legal framework superseding the Obama executive orders which have caused so much friction in the Trump administration.
Trump’s address (02.00 GMT 9/1/19) was a forewarning and may finally create an opportunity for the president to overrule the Obama era directives, so that the people who have been in service to Obama within all governmental agencies can be removed, purged from the system. This ‘draining of the swamp’ would then allow a clear path for Trump to move forward with his plans and not hit a brick wall at every move.
Immediately from day one, every governmental agency within the United States was actively working against the president, and many governmental employees are actively seeking to undermine Trump’s decision making at every point.
By declaring a national emergency directive, much of Obama’s deep state will be rooted out and crushed. There are many in the U.S. media who may be arrested as well as those on Capitol Hill, for their acts of treason against the country and president.
One way or another, the Teflon Don will have his way, and this is why you have to sit back, break out the popcorn and Schlitz, because when the fireworks start, the real entertainment will commence in earnest.
CNN used to be the bastion of American news reporting, where it actually reported what was going on with actual journalistic facts. Sadly, it has now been denigrated to such a low level of so-called journalism that it is no longer seen as journalistic.
“CNN is now all about opinion, and this opinion is solely socialistic, extreme left wing rhetoric mixed in with half-truths and blatant political bias favouring one single party. CNN no longer reports the facts, it is a mere tool for socialist Americans to parrot their propaganda 24 hours a day into the heads of American citizens,” a former prominent CNN broadcaster revealed.
Shameful bias
How this media giant has fallen from the heyday of Ted Turner’s charge is precipitous. Looking from the outside inward, the former news service is blighted by extreme leftist stars like Don Lemon, a racist anti-white homosexual rights campaigner who decries anything that is not black supremacist or linked to the gay rights movement. His political ideology is so far to the left, it smacks of Soviet Marxist rhetoric, spewed out to the American audiences day in day out.
Even former host Larry King recently commented about the company he used to work for: “CNN stopped doing news a long time ago, they do Trump.”
The actual CNN reporting and journalism from within Iraq during the Gulf war, are decades behind and entrenched in history now, because if you watch the channel today, all you will get is anti-Trump discussions, and biased political anti-conservative anti-alternative media anti-free speech talk points more relevant to a Soviet communist state than America.
The blatantly biased political opinion of a news agency that used to report the news, is something that goes against all journalistic rules, and condemns CNN to become a mere echo chamber for socialistic rhetoric and propaganda.
As for Ted Turner, what happened to him? He recently commented on the demise of the channel by saying he’d prefer his old network had a more balanced agenda, “but that’s just one man’s opinion.”
