What we have seen in the last day or so in the Brexit imbroglio is a capitulation by staunch eurosceptic Tory MPs with regards to the flawed Theresa May Brexit deal.

Jacob Rees Mogg and his coterie of ERG members including Boris Johnson are now backing the backstop deal of Theresa May, twice rejected in parliament votes.

Limit choice

There is some intelligence in the way May, through her advisory panel have acted within the last few weeks, and this steering of votes has been due to the calculated illusion of a loss of control. What the PM has done is to allow the premise of Brexit to be threatened completely by taking No Deal off the table, an act which goes against legal avenues, and is contradictory to what is stated in the Conservative manifesto.

Here was May bleating day after day for years that “No Deal was better than a Bad Deal” only to renege on her promise to voters at the last moment and put a free vote to parliament so that a House of Commons that is 95% Remain can vote No Deal down.

By eking out the Brexit process, May has allowed MPs to try to subvert the EU Referendum result, and she has actively encouraged an element of chaos by feigning weakness in her leadership. By all means May is not weak, her steely character is devoid of emotion and robotically carries out her daily operations. This is a person who cannot relate to other humans in the traditional sense but only through intricate levels of manipulation in order to get her way.

Through the perceived element of chaos, where everything seems to have lost control, one can steer MPs and voters in any election towards a certain goal. Putting artificial time limits on processes also helps to create a level of urgency.

Therefore, you create the problem, take out strategically all other positive avenues, add in sudden negative avenues with free MP votes, amendments, sweeten up your marks with a Chequers meal, et voila, from chaos one brings order.

Parliamentarians like to think they’re clever but like civilian sheep they have to be rounded up too into their pens. Bribes, promises, chaos, whatever, it all comes down to, greed or fear, the carrot or the stick these chumps are manipulated and steered as much as anyone else.

Ultimately, at the top of the hierarchy, the EU are now laughing all the way to the bank and will be salivating at the £39 billion they will receive soon. Britain has shown itself to be a nation housed by treacherous MPs intent on betraying their own nation and people and a parliament that is devoid of democracy. Britain never won World War I, or World War II, those were mere battles because the war was won by the EU in the end, headed by Germany of course, and they did not have to fire a single shot to win it.

In a final ditch bid to win over MPs to back her terrible Brexit deal for the third time, Theresa May plans on utilising a technique women have used for thousands of years — crying.

Psychologist, Ian Barner, explains the technique in full and how it is used the world over to sway opinion.

“Women are always right according to their outlook, but they’re even more right when they cry. This technique utilised by females is learned from childhood, and carries on until adulthood so that women get what they want at all times. All it takes is the waterworks to get going, and any man or woman in the vicinity immediately believes every word the crying woman says and empathises with them. It takes a pretty cold heart not to. The only problem for the PM will be the actual act of crying and how she will bring on the tears. Her character as many know, is one of no character or emotion, plus she has probably not cried in her whole lifetime, unlike most normal women. Her current advisers will thus be training her to cry through the use of strategically placed onions near her eyes, and compel her to think of the saddest moment in her life during the process.”

When May cries, she will most probably commit the act during a parliamentary session to create the biggest effect of sympathy. If she can cry just before the third vote, and look sincere about it, she may garner more support and votes from swaying MPs.

Labour MP Rupert Mandingson, for Huxbridge constituency, has said he would vote for her deal if she cries in the House of Commons prior to the third vote.

“I am a socialist at heart so if I see crying, I immediately switch into caring mode. My wife recently told me she had an affair with a Brexiteer and is now pregnant with twins, at first I was very angry, but after she cried, I agreed for her boyfriend to move in and for me to fund everything. Women’s tears can make anything possible.”