17.7 C
London
Sunday, April 12, 2026
secret satire society
Home Blog Page 483

Clueless Cameron Threatens War Unless Britain Loses Sovereignty to EU

Mr. Charrington
-
2
Clueless Cameron Threatens War Unless Britain Loses Sovereignty to EU

 

Sir Winston Churchill, despite claims from the Strongerin camp, would have been disgusted at the state of the EU today. He certainly would have baulked at the Schengen zone which allows free movement of terrorists and he would have fought tooth and nail against the subjugation of Britain to an almighty Germanic EU Reich Empire.

Churchill wished for an Anglo-Franco union, but instead what we have today is a Germano-Franco union where Britain is the cash cow, feeding the EU £19.1 billion per year to be stifled, vetoed and inundated by millions of parasitic EU citizens taking our resources, flooding our hospitals and schools, as well as taking jobs away from British citizens.

In World War II millions of people died to free Europe from the Nazis and yet here is Lord Haw Haw Cameron wanting Britain to give up their whole nation to the German Empire for a pittance.

What Cameron is in essence saying is that the brave people who died to ensure Britain’s freedom in the world wars ‘Died for Nothing‘ because Cameron is handing Britain back into the hands of the enemy on a platter.

An EU army would be the cause of war more than anything else, because it would be seen as a direct threat to Russia on its doorstep. Already, the EU are guilty of poking the Russian bear with a stick with their actions in the Ukraine resulting in Putin annexing the Crimea.

David Cameron is a disgrace, a lowly tin-pot bullying dictator who utilises fear tactics on the populace to make them bend to his traitorous wishes.

You must ignore everything David Cameron says, he is lying through his teeth with every ridiculous utterance.

We Will Vote Leave on June 23 and there is NOTHING they can do to change our minds.

Referendum: Cameron Concealing EU Plan to Ban English Common Law and Habeus corpus

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Referendum: Cameron Concealing EU Plan to Ban English Common Law and Habeus corpus

From the time of the Magna Carta Britons have always had the right to appeal against unlawful arrest, and have always been afforded the right of trial by jury, but this will be lost if Britain stays in the EU.

The right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has nonetheless long been celebrated as the most efficient safeguard of the liberty of the subject. The jurist Albert Venn Dicey wrote that the British Habeas Corpus Acts “declare no principle and define no rights, but they are for practical purposes worth a hundred constitutional articles guaranteeing individual liberty”

If you vote to remain, you will be party to killing off liberty in Britain. The Continental law that will supersede the British will have the right to detain anyone without trial for as long as they please.

The creation of the EPPO (European Public Prosecutor’s Office) will see prosecutors loyal only to Brussels stationed to Britain wielding the same powers as our own officials.

“To a free circulation of people shall correspond a free circulation of judicial decisions. This is where the principle of mutual recognition leads to a real change in the philosophy of judicial cooperation. It means that each national judicial authority must recognise decisions made by the judicial authority of another EU country with a minimum of formalities, and with very few exceptions.”

These plans to create a centralised EU prosecutor will fatally undermine Britain’s legal system and kill off the principles of trial by jury and ‘innocent until proven guilty’ which have been the fundamental rights of Britons since the Magna Carta.

We must Vote Leave on June 23 to preserve our system of law which has been at the forefront of Britain’s justice system for a thousand years and served us well.

Greek Default As IMF Threatens to Pull Out Third Bailout

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Greek Default As IMF Threatens to Pull Out Third Bailout

Greece is set to fail completion of a first progress report, or evaluation, of the economy that has been drawn out for the past nine months and has stalled over lender disagreement.

The Institutions (formerly ‘Troika’) are concerned that the Greeks refuse to overhaul their lucrative pension schemes, and generous pay packets.

Trying to reform a profligate country that spent 350 billion euros in EU loans in less than two years is going to be hard work.

In a leaked document, the IMF is threatening to pull out of another much needed loan to Greece, and compounded with additional eurozone pressures this could mean a final default for Greece. Technically, Greece has already defaulted, but it has been worded in other terms.

The recent Wikileaks publication involves the top two IMF officials in charge of managing the Greek debt crisis – Poul Thomsen, the head of the IMF’s European Department, and Delia Velkouleskou, the IMF Mission Chief for Greece.

The IMF anticipates a Greek default coinciding with the United Kingdom’s referendum on whether it should leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).

What the BSE (Britain Stronger in EU) group are not telling EU referendum voters in the UK is that the Greeks will default one month after the referendum. If Britain is still locked into the failing EU, it will be liable by the ESM (European Stability Mechanism) to pay billions more to the fund to shore up the Greek black hole.

It is exactly a Greek black hole, because trillions of taxpayer funds from other EU members are thrown into it where the money disappears without any trace.

To remove ourselves from this inevitable disaster, Britain must leave the EU on June 23 or we will be liable for the debt of others without any recourse or compensation.

Vote Leave on June 23 or condemn Britain to decades of payments without representation. Every week the UK sends £350 million to Brussels, and we get nothing back. We must change this or our nation will go down the sewer of EU history, flushed violently by the hand of misfortune.

Sadiq Khan: “I’d Like to Sharia This Moment of Joy With You As Your New Mayor”

Mr. Charrington
-
1
Sadiq Khan: “I’d Like to Sharia This Moment of Joy With You As Your New Mayor”

And it’s goodbye from Boris, a fully competent Mayor of London who despite being labelled a buffoon presided over London with capable hands.

Welcome Sadiq Khan, the Labour candidate for Mayor, much like Red Ken he has a thing about Jews, but that’s okay, he’s not only left wing but a Muslim so its acceptable.

Speaking at his inauguration, Khan said: “I would first like to thank Tower Hamlets, without their support, I wouldn’t be here. Also, nice one Barnet. I would like to behead, ahem, I mean thank Zac Goldsmith, because it was his Islamophobic campaign which rallied my troops. Some of us were so angry we voted three or four times each, and it paid off. We will start first thing tomorrow with plans for more mosques across London. I plan to have the muezzins calling for prayers every evening. Cycle lanes? Pah! Those things will be of the past. In their place we shall have separate lanes for men and women.  I would like to conclude this speech with a profound shout of Allahu Akbar!”

Donald Trump, who is said to visit the capital next week, on hearing the news of a Muslim Mayor of London has already called for the city to be nuked.

 

Why Globalists Will Have to Re-Think Their Strategy

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Why Globalists Will Have to Re-Think Their Strategy

 

Thus, the usually heavily controlled process of nomination in the upcoming U.S. election has been thrown off kilter.

Globalists must understand one thing, and that racial, religious hatreds are ingrained in societies even today in 2016. The world is one of division, of parity, and even though there are some portions of the world living in so-called civilised Western country’s there are others living in areas holding traditions from thousands of years ago.

It should not be ‘racist’ to suggest that some races of humans are different to others, when they clearly are, scientifically this difference in racial types is frowned upon and the research dusted under the carpet, however there is truth in the matter that over the centuries different racial groups developed in their own unique way.

It is also frowned upon to suggest that different racial groups have varying levels of IQ, although this measure has many variables, there is conclusive scientific evidence to suggest that some races are different to others in intelligence. Within the global community, there is of course a common ground, however it may take many centuries for some cultures and racial groups to reach the level of others.

This is why, the globalists are having such a hard time at the moment, this is a time of consolidation. Of course, the globalists know of the vast differences within the human spectrum, however they seem to think that by putting this unholy soup together in one pot everything will be dandy. They are wrong in this assumption, and one only has to study ancient history to realise that humans have barely evolved since.

Naturally, there are infinite variables to realise when conducting a global exercise in mixing, but one seems to think that there is also a level of hypocrisy in the global agenda. Would the almighty globalist deem him or herself equal to one of the masses, or relative in intelligence to someone who exists in extreme poverty and can only utter a few words? The answer is probably not, and yet, the globalists want to clash the civilisations anyway, and try to somehow make it work.

Globalists must also understand that it is not only racial, cultural, intelligence that divides but religion is the greatest divider of all. Yes, of course they know that already, however, if one is to build a true global community, the divisive nature of religion must be amalgamated maybe into a singular religion or to have all religion erased completely. The time will come when this choice will have to be made.

The European Union is now accepting millions of Muslims from war torn Syria, but what the Muslims entering the EU do not know is that their religion will be watered down, tamed and Europeanised. This is the challenge the EU has set for itself, and it will eviscerate Islam by first taming the religion, to change it from its root and evolve it into something else. The EU itself is a religion, as much as Communism is, it holds the tenets of many religions as it is a man made institution holding allegiance to an almighty state/God.

There are no clear answers to the global agenda, however the future is one that can only be shaped by the few.

EU Bends Rules to Create Visa-Free Zone From Syria to English Channel

Mr. Charrington
-
0
EU Bends Rules to Create Visa-Free Zone From Syria to English Channel
  • The Commission has proposed visa-free access for 76 million Turkish citizens to the Schengen Area, creating a visa-free zone from the English Channel to the borders of the warzones of Syria and Iraq.
  • This is part of an ‘accelerated’ move towards Turkish accession to the EU, which the UK is paying £1.8 billion to facilitate.
  • The Commission has also proposed visa-free access for Kosovo.
  • The Commission refuses to address the root cause of the crisis, the EU’s dangerous Schengen system.
  • The Commission has today said that ‘Schengen is one of the greatest achievements of the European Union’.
  • Due to the EU migrant crisis, there are just two Border Force cutters protecting the UK’s borders at the present time.
  • Despite Government claims, the Dublin Regulation does not work in the UK’s interests (allowing for the removal of just 1% of asylum seekers). The EU retains the right to end the UK’s participation in the Dublin regulation after the referendum.
  • The European Court will remain in control of the UK’s asylum policy if the UK votes to stay in the EU.

 

MIGRANTS

The deal with Turkey and proposals to revive Schengen

 

The European Commission has  proposed to give visa free access to the Schengen Area to 76 million Turkish citizens as part of its plan for Turkey to join the EU. The UK is already paying nearly £2 billion to facilitate further accessions.

The Commission ‘is today proposing to the European Parliament and Council of the European Union to lift the visa requirements for the citizens of Turkey’.

This is despite the Commission’s acknowledgement that that implementation of some of the benchmarks by Turkey has been ‘impossible‘, including the ‘fight against corruption, data protection, judicial cooperation with all Member States, enhanced cooperation with EUROPOL and revision of the legislation and practices on terrorism’. This amounts to 10% (5 out of 72) of the benchmarks.

The Commission states that ‘the accession process will be re-energised, with Chapter 33 to be opened during the Dutch Presidency of the Council of the European Union and preparatory work on the opening of other chapters to continue at an accelerated pace’.

Between 2014 and 2021, the UK will pay over £1.8 billion to facilitate the accession of candidate countries to the EU. This will mean a population of Turkey, 75.9 million in 2014, will have access to the NHS and other amenities.

This will increase pressure on the UK’s borders. The EU’s own Frontex report has noted that: ‘The number of persons aiming to get to the UK with fraudulent document significantly increased (+70%) compared to 2014. This trend is mostly attributable to the increasing number of Albanian nationals often misusing Italian and Greek ID cards followed by Ukrainian nationals abusing authentic Polish ID cards’.

 

Kosovo guns

 

The Commission has also proposed Kosovo be given visa free access.

The Commission is ‘today proposing to the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to lift the visa requirements for the people of Kosovo by transferring Kosovo to the visa-free list for short-stays in the Schengen area’.

Kosovo has around 260,000 unregistered firearms (one for every six Kosovars), and ‘has for decades been one of the major distribution centres of narcotics entering Europe via the Balkan route’. The Foreign Policy Journal has described it as a ‘nest of crime fugitives in Europe‘.

Kosovo also has the highest unemployment rate of any EU enlargement country.

The real cause of the crisis is the Schengen system but the EU is determined to maintain that at any cost to prop up the failing single currency.

 

The Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs Dimitris Avramopoulos has said: ‘Schengen is one of the greatest achievements of the European Union, and our unchanged ultimate ambition is to restore normality in the Schengen area’.

 

The Vice President of the Commission, Frans Timmermans said ‘We have a clear roadmap to return to a normal functioning of the Schengen zone by November and we need to get there in an orderly way. We preserve Schengen by applying Schengen‘. If there ever was a demonstration of insanity, Timmermans words would be it.

The President of the Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, has said: ‘If the spirit of Schengen leaves our lands and our hearts, we will lose more than Schengen. A single currency makes no sense if Schengen falls. It is one of the keystones of European construction. The Schengen system is partially comatose. Those who believe in Europe and its values, in its principles and freedoms must try – and try they will – to reanimate the Schengen spirit’.

 

The former Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald K Noble, has said the Schengen system ‘is effectively an international passport-free zone for terrorists to execute attacks on the Continent and make their escape… Leading up to these latest attacks, none of those countries systematically screened passports or verified the identities of those crossing borders by land or at seaports or airports. This is like hanging a sign welcoming terrorists to Europe. And they have been accepting the invitation’.

border cutter

There are just two Border Force cutters protecting the UK’s borders from illegal entry because of the EU migrant crisis. This leaves the UK border vulnerable.

 

On 7 March 2016, the Government announced that the ‘the cutter Protector’ and ‘and a further Border Force cutter’ will be deployed to the Aegean Sea from the end of this month. This means that 40% of the UK’s border protection fleet will not be protecting British waters.

The Government has previously admitted that of the five cutters, ‘only four are operational at any one time, [with] the fifth undergoing refitting and refurbishment’. This means that there are just 2 cutters, or 40% of the UK’s fleet, currently protecting our border.

This Government has not secured the continuation of the UK’s participation in the Dublin Regulation.

The UK can choose whether or not to opt into the proposed changes. It chose to opt into the Dublin Regulation. EU asylum measures are adopted under Title V of Part 3 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union. The UK is not bound by measures adopted under Title V unless it chooses to opt in. The UK opted into the Dublin Regulation when it was ‘recast’ in 2013.

If the EU Council determines that the UK’s continued participation in Dublin would render the new proposals inoperable, it may exclude the UK from Dublin with ‘financial consequences’. Where proposals to amend a Title V measure to which the UK has opted in are made, the UK has a veto. However, ‘in cases where the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, determines that the non-participation of the United Kingdom … in the amended version of an existing measure makes the application of that measure inoperable for other Member States or the Union’, the UK must opt in, or ‘the existing measure shall no longer be binding upon or applicable to it’. The Council of Ministers can impose ‘financial consequences‘ on the UK which are ‘necessarily and unavoidably incurred as a result of the cessation of its participation in the existing measure’.

The proposal contemplates the exclusion of the UK from the Dublin Regulation. The text of the proposal notes that: ‘The participation of the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark in the arrangements laid down in this proposal recasting Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 will be determined in the course of negotiations in accordance with these Protocols’. It explicitly notes that the UK must ensure ‘the operability’ of the new system.

Experts in EU law have suggested the UK could be excluded. Professor Steve Peers of the University of Essex has predicted that if a ‘complete overhaul’ of the Dublin regulation is introduced, this is ‘likely to trigger’ the exclusion of the UK from Dublin III.

MEPs will not accept a new system based on the country of origin principle. The European Parliament’s Dublin rapporteur, Cecilia Wikström MEP, has said: ‘The country of first arrival criteria should be removed from the Dublin regulation and replaced with a fair and mandatory distribution mechanism between Member States, using a formula based on population, wealth and reception capabilities’.

eu migrants boat

The Dublin Regulation does not work in the UK’s interests and gives up control to the European Court. Remaining subject to the Dublin Regulation would not be a victory for the UK.

The Dublin Regulation allows for the removal of just 1% of asylum seekers.

The European Court is in charge of our asylum policy. Opting into the Dublin Regulation nonetheless means giving up control of the UK’s asylum system to the European Court of Justice because the UK has also opted into several further directives on who constitutes a refugee, how they must be processed and the how they must be treated. Along with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, these prevent the UK from adopting its own asylum policy and mean the European Court is in charge of interpreting the key 1951 UN Refugee Convention.

The only way to have an independent asylum policy is to Vote Leave. This will give us much greater flexibility in how we deal with asylum claims.

The Dublin Regulation can result in the UK being forced to accept EU asylum seekers.

In January 2016, Mr Justice McCloskey ordered migrants at Calais to be admitted to the UK to claim asylum. The Tribunal ordered that: ‘the Secretary of State shall admit each Applicant to the United Kingdom with a view to determining the applications under the provisions of the Dublin Regulation’.

 

David Cameron used to oppose the European Court’s powers over asylum, but none of this changed during the renegotiation.

In January 2008, the Conservative Party tabled an amendment to the Bill ratifying the Lisbon Treaty to exclude the European Court’s jurisdiction over asylum. It was signed by William Hague, Nick Herbert and Dominic Grieve.

Nonetheless, altering the European Court’s control of our asylum policy did not form part of the renegotiation.

 

Even the European Commission has acknowledged that the Dublin system does not work.

The Commission has admitted that: ‘Even where Member States accept transfer requests, only about a quarter of such cases result in effective transfers, and, after completion of a transfer, there are frequent cases of secondary movements back to the transferring Member State’.

It notes that: ‘The effective suspension of Dublin transfers to Greece since 2011 has proved a particularly critical weakness in the system, in particular given the large number of migrants arriving in Greece in recent months’. This is the result of a ruling of the European Court which held the Charter of Fundamental Rights could be used to prevent transfers to other member states.

The Commission has noted that ‘the Dublin system was not designed to ensure a sustainable sharing of responsibility for asylum applicants across the EU, a shortcoming that has been highlighted by the current crisis’.

It notes that there has been ‘an increasing disregard of EU rules’ in recent years.

If we vote to stay we will pay even more in, hand more power over and face the prospect of greater pressure on our borders. The safe option is to Vote Leave on 23 June. 

Why a German EU Army is Precursor to Imminent War With Russia

Mr. Charrington
-
8
Why a German EU Army is Precursor to Imminent War With Russia

 

The Nazis incorporated many different European nations into their army, much like Jean Claude Juncker and his friend Roderich Kiesewetter want to do with today’s proposed EU army.

Juncker is of course no stranger to the Nazis, as his father was a member of Hitler’s army push into Russia in 1941 codenamed ‘Operation Barbarossa’.

Juncker’s wife, Christiane, also shares an interesting paternal link with the Nazis. Her father, Louis Mathias Frising, was one of Hitler’s Propaganda Commissars, and was among those responsible for the Germanification of Juncker’s home country of Luxembourg. He also helped enforce the Nuremburg Laws that stripped Jews of their rights, and were a precursor to the Holocaust.

Currently the EU seeks to announce the commencement of the German-led EU army after Britain’s referendum, and if we do not vote to leave, future generations will inherit a conscription in the EU army to fight the Russian bear.

As the Germans have already absorbed the Dutch army, they will incorporate all other EU nations into the military force to eventually attack Russia. The German Bundeswehr is expanding for the first time since the Cold War.

By building an EU army on the doorstep of Russia, the Brussels eurocrats are teasing Russia, they are building what is seen as a direct threat to Putin, and this message can only end ultimately in war.

We have already witnessed what the EU’s incursion into the Ukraine caused, when Putin retaliated with the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

It is in Britain’s interests to stay out of the EU under its dangerous state, by leaving the EU, it would retain control but most importantly not threaten the Russian bear, unlike the EU army which will catastrophically set off World War III.

Vote Leave on June 23 – No to Germano-EU Army

The EU hinders, Not Helps Britain’s Ability to Support the Environment

Mr. Charrington
-
0
The EU hinders, Not Helps Britain’s Ability to Support the Environment

 

 

 

Responding to claims by Britain Stronger in Europe that leaving the EU would harm the environment, George Eustice MP, Minister for the Marine Environment said:

 

‘Since the Lisbon Treaty the EU has systematically undermined the UK’s place on international wildlife conventions. We have already been stripped of our voting rights on Regional Fisheries Management Organisations and, extraordinarily, it is now unlawful for the UK to speak at wildlife conventions like CITES without first getting permission for what we want to say from the European Commission.

‘If we vote to leave and take control, the UK would regain its own seat and its voice in vital international wildlife conventions and everything from promoting shark conservation to ending whaling would become much easier.’

 

Also commenting, Gisela Stuart MP, Chair of Vote Leave said:

 

‘Pro-EU campaigners are descending into absurdity. It seems there is no good in the world that they cannot somehow attribute to the EU and no imagined disaster they cannot predict if we Vote Leave. In reality, if we Vote Leave on 23 June we can reclaim our voice at international institutions and spend the £350 million we hand to Brussels every week on our priorities likes the environment.’

 

The EU is bad for the green economy, with the European Court recently requiring the UK to raise taxation on energy saving products.

Because of a European Court ruling in June 2015, stating that the UK’s 5% rate of VAT on the installation of all energy saving materials was contrary to EU law, VAT will have to rise to 20% instead of 5%. The reduced rate of 5% on other products, such as insulation, heat pumps and central heating systems, will cease to apply to persons who are not (a) over 60, (b) in receipt of benefits, or (c) living in social housing. The cost of installing solar panels for consumers could increase by £1,000.

The UK must comply with this judgement, even if it means overruling the VAT lock, or face fines from the European Court.

 

The EU has threatened to sue Britain for trying to protect wildlife. We cannot ban the export of live animals for slaughter in the EU.

In 2009, the UK was reported to have voted against a common EU position to abstain on banning the international trade in bluefin tuna, in a secret ballot in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. The Commission reportedly considered launching legal proceedings against the UK as a result.

The Government has admitted that a prohibition on the export of live animals for slaughter is inconsistent with EU law.

 

The EU has failed to keep the air clean. Its Emissions Trading Scheme has been labelled a an abject failure by Friends of the Earth and has proven a vehicle for defrauding of taxpayers.

Friends of the Earth labelled the EU’s emissions trading scheme ‘an abject failure’.

Between June 2008 and December 2009, fraudsters made €5 billion out of the ETS by exploiting single market rules, in what is known as a ‘carousel fraud’. HMRC accepts that VAT fraud ‘exploits the Single Market rules that were introduced in 1992′.

As recently as July 2015, the EU’s own auditors concluded that: ‘The ETS market remains at risk to VAT fraud‘.

 

EU policies have simply led to ‘carbon leakage’. This does nothing to improve the environment.

The European Commission has admitted that their policies have led to ‘Carbon leakage’ – firms leaving Europe and carrying on polluting in other countries. A report produced for the Commission in 2013 acknowledged that  ‘Energy discussions play a major role in the overall situation for industry and are always on the background of carbon leakage discussions. Be it cheap shale gas in the US and Middle East or subsidised coal in China, the impact of energy prices is real’.

 

Leaving the EU will not damage environmental investment, which could be increased if we Vote Leave.

In 2014, the UK paid £19.1 billion into the EU budget, over £350 million per week. Investment within the environment sector in Britain would thus increase if we Vote to Leave.

 

EU rules have stopped Britain building the homes it needs.

 

The Government has acknowledged that ‘EU rules such as the Habitats Directive and wider EU environmental permit requirements’ are regulations which stop housebuilders ‘building the homes that Britain needs’.

The Home Builders Federation has said that the implementation of the Habitats Directive ‘brought house building activity to a virtual halt in large parts of some 11 local authorities in Berkshire, Surrey and NE Hampshire’ ten years ago, ‘leading to significant job losses in the home building industry and threatening the existence of many SME companies in the region’.

 

The Environment Secretary has previously criticised damaging EU rules which remain unchanged.

In January, Ms Truss said: ‘I am fighting for reforms like getting rid of the three-crop rule, reforming the over-the-top audit and controls regime, and the absurd requirement for farmers to put up ugly posters in the countryside to publicise EU funding‘.

Ms Truss has also accepted ‘there are serious costs‘ to membership of the EU’s single market. None of these matters were changed during the renegotiation.

Why VR Zombies Are Next Step in Population Control

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Why VR Zombies Are Next Step in Population Control

The next step up from smartphones has to be Virtual Reality, and from there the next step will be internal brain chips once the technology has reached its final phase.

Speaking at this month’s California Tech Symposium, John Aldred CEO of Virtuaxel Solutions Inc, told the audience that VR is an ‘immersive experience that people will not be able to live without’.

“What we have here is an introduction to the technical version of nirvana, of emulating any emotion from fear to lust. You may live in mundane surroundings now but put on the glasses and you will be immersed within a palace of the senses.

“Once we get people hooked with VR, there will be no stopping us evolving to neural brain chips, where the user will not only be connected permanently to the internet hive mind but will be able to enjoy dream-like experiences that are as good as real directly to their brains. The nano-chips will fuse with the neurons, dendrites and synapses replicating actual experiences for the users. You can live in a film, you can go on a holiday, you can be somebody else, you can create whole worlds and explore infinite possibilities.

zuckerberg plankton

“It is crucial that VR opens the door to the next step in internal chip processing. Just as any app can be downloaded onto a tablet computer or smartphone, so too will implanted chip users be able to download into their own brains apps, either for educational or pleasure purposes and the chips will adapt to each individual human.

“Imagine experiencing an app in your mind, then an advert comes in at certain intervals. Advertisers will be able to beam straight into the users mind, and the user will either be forced to experience the advert or they could in rare circumstances bypass the transmission. Creating brain chip apps will not be an easy or cheap task therefore brain chip developers will have to fund their work with advertising. It is an accepted form of operations today in the 2d world, therefore the immersive world will fully accept it as well, as they will have no choice if they want to use the Cloud linked apps.

“As for correction of human behaviour, there will be psychiatric apps that alter the users mental state, there will also be less crime because criminals will be easily controlled through internal chipping. Behaviour will be moderated and controlled through neuromorphic adaptable processors, and within a decade all crime could be eradicated.

“Eventually brain chipping will occur at birth. This will ensure the foetus is compliant with the state and will develop once born to be fully adherent to all protocols of civilised society.

“Education wise, children will have no need for schools or teachers, as they will be taught all they need to know in nanoseconds.

“With the advent of AI, most of the human population will not need to work. The artificial intelligence enabled forms will conduct most work tasks, and make most jobs redundant to humans. Corporations will increase their productivity without a flawed human labour force.

“These are the solutions to all of humanities problems and are a natural evolution to the human species.”

Vote Leave Responds to latest BSE False Claims of Brexit ‘Economic Armageddon’

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Vote Leave Responds to latest BSE False Claims of Brexit ‘Economic Armageddon’

 

 

Responding to claims by the Britain Stronger in Europe (BSE) campaign that UK trade would fall by £250 billion if we Vote Leave, Vote Leave Chief Executive Matthew Elliott said:

“BSE can’t even be consistent or honest in their campaign to do down the British economy. Their underlying belief appears to be that Britain –  the world’s fifth largest economy and a nation with a great history of trading across the globe – would be an economic backwater if it wasn’t for Brussels taking control of our trade deals. That’s absurd. After we Vote Leave we will take back control of the powers we’ve surrendered to EU bureaucrats and stop sending Brussels £350 million a week. That would boost our economy and allow us to spend our money on our priorities.”

 

 

Lord Darling and BSE can’t make up their minds about how many billions they say will be lost if we Vote Leave. They have already used different figures to make the same claim, while leading figures in their campaign have admitted trade would not be affected.

BSE claims today that ‘for the first time’, it is showing the volume of trade ‘at risk if we leave’ the EU. This is wrong.

On 3 January 2016, BSE claimed that ‘new research shows over £235bn of trade at risk if Britain leaves the EU’.

Prominent BSE campaigner Anna Soubry has said that exports to the EU will ‘go down to almost absolutely zero if we come out of the EU’. In 2015, the UK exported £223.3 billion of goods and services to the EU.

 

 

Lord Darling previously claimed that the amount of trade that would be lost would be £92 billion.

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, who is leading the IN campaign, has admitted trade would not be affected: ‘If we were outside the EU altogether, we’d still be trading with all these European countries, of course we would … Of course the trading would go on … There’s a lot of scaremongering on all sides of this debate. Of course the trading would go on’.

The Head of the IN campaign, Lord Rose, has also admitted that ‘nothing is going to happen if we come out of Europe… It’s not going to be a step change or somebody’s going to turn the lights out and we’re all suddenly going to find that we can’t go to France, it’s going to be a gentle process’.

 

 

BSE’s figures do not add up.

BSE states that in 2014, trade with EU was £520 billion. They claim that ‘UK trade with the EU is 76% higher than it would have been in the absence of EU membership and we had traded without an agreement’. Nonetheless, BSE’s figures do not show a 76% fall in trade. Their methodology and sources are unclear.

A 76% fall in trade with the EU would result in trade falling to £124.8 billion, a reduction of £395.2 billion. Yet BSE claims that trade with the EU would fall by £224 billion.

BSE have not quantified a 76% fall in exports either. In 2014, the UK exported £228.9 billion to the EU. A £224 billion reduction would amount to a 97.8% fall in exports, not a 76% fall.

It is entirely unclear how BSE calculated the £224 billion figure. BSE also claims that their research shows that the EU has been negotiating trade deals since 1974. However, the earliest trade deal cited in their table is one in which negotiations started in 1985.

 

 

Countries outside the EU trade with it to a greater extent than the UK does. It is ridiculous to suggest that trade with the EU might fall by 43%.

In 2015, 53.7% of Switzerland’s exports were sold to the EU. In 2015, 43.7% of UK exports were sold to the EU.

The OECD has noted that: ‘the EU absorbs around 45% of Swiss exports of financial services, despite the absence of passporting rights for its banks’. In 2014, exports to the EU of financial services, insurance and pensions represent 33% of the UK’s exports in those sectors. Nonetheless, BSE suggests that 43% of the UK’s trade with the EU could disappear if we Vote Leave. This is ridiculous.

 

 

BSE has already admitted third country free trade agreements could continue if we Vote Leave.

The Executive Director of the IN campaign, Will Straw has accepted that free trade agreements with third countries could continue after we Vote Leave, stating: ‘either eventuality could come to pass’.

After we Vote Leave, we would be free to immediately start negotiations with third countries to strike free trade deals. There are 1,720 civil servants in Whitehall who specialise in trade policy who could be deployed during this period to ensure a smooth transition. These deals could come into force after the treaties cease to apply to the UK.

If the UK makes clear it wants existing agreements to be maintained on current terms, there is little reason to think any third country with which the EU currently has a free trade agreement would disagree. The UK is, after all, the fifth largest economy in the world. There is no reason why third countries would want to cut off access to the UK market.

As the Prime Minister of New Zealand, John Key, has said: ‘we would want to preserve both our existing position with Great Britain and continue to grow that relationship. We would need to find a way through that. The reality is there are a number of mechanisms where that would be possible’.

 

 

Lord Darling claims that leaving the EU ‘would mean introducing tariffs and barriers to our trade’, but IN campaigners have already admitted this is inaccurate.

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, has admitted: ‘If we were outside the EU altogether, we’d still be trading with all these European countries, of course we would … Of course the trading would go on … There’s a lot of scaremongering on all sides of this debate. Of course the trading would go on’.

The UK’s former Ambassador to the EU and leading supporter of the BSE campaign, Lord Kerr, has admitted: ‘there is no doubt that the UK could secure a free trade agreement with the EU. That is not an issue‘.

Even the pro-EU CBI has said: ‘the UK is highly likely to secure a Free Trade Agreement with the EU, and such an agreement would be likely to be negotiated at an extremely high level of ambition relative to other FTAs [free trade agreements]’.

The pro-EU Centre for European Reform has accepted that, ‘given the importance of the UK market to the eurozone, the UK would probably have little difficulty in negotiating an FTA‘.

The Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond, has admitted that a free trade agreement in goods ‘would be relatively simple to negotiate’.

 

 

BSE seem to accept that it could take less than two years to strike a free trade deal with the EU. This is a reasonable assumption.

 

BSE admits that the EU has struck free trade deals in less than two years. In the table in their press release, BSE claims that the EU and Mexico struck a free trade deal in 1.83 years (though it is unclear how it came to this figure).

Trade deals take on average two years to complete. Oxford Economics states that ‘an analysis of regional trade deals conducted over the past 20 years found an average duration of 28 months’.

The US-Australia free trade agreement was concluded in less than two years. Formal negotiations for a free trade agreement began in Canberra on 18 March 2003. The agreement came into effect on 1 January 2005. The US Government states that: ‘as a result of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement, tariffs that averaged 4.3 percent were eliminated on more than 99% of the tariff lines for U.S. manufactured goods exports to Australia’.

The US-Canada free trade agreement was negotiated in less than two years. According to the Government of Canada, ‘In 1987, both countries agreed to the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA). Negotiations toward a free trade agreement with the U.S. began in 1986. The two nations agreed to a historic agreement that placed Canada and the United States at the forefront of trade liberalization. Key elements of the agreement included the elimination of tariffs, the reduction of many non-tariff barriers, and it was among the first trade agreements to address trade in services. It also included a dispute settlement mechanism for the fair and expeditious resolution of trade disputes’.

1...482483484...814Page 483 of 814
squib footer 270

Breaking News

Copyright © Daily Squib 2026.

The Daily Squib is a curious satirical parody newspaper offering breaking news, political satire, comedy, investigative journalism, opinion and celebrity news.

KAjwhriuw024hvjbed2SORH