17.7 C
London
Tuesday, February 3, 2026
secret satire society
Home Blog Page 135

Leftist Luvvies Dismiss Pictures of Beheaded Jewish Babies

Senna Sore
-
1
Leftist Luvvies Dismiss Pictures of Beheaded Jewish Babies

Luvvies including Tilda Swinton, Steve Coogan and Maxine Peake have come under fire for failing to condemn Hamas’ brutal terror attacks in a letter calling for a ceasefire.

“We don’t see Jews as humans, so anything that happens to them, we just ignore it and laugh. If it was a bunch of Palestinian babies beheaded, then we would acknowledge our disgust,” one of the celebrities said, giggling inanely.

Being a champagne socialist Marxist celebrity is not easy these days because some people are seeing through their virtue signalling and narcissism.

“I was having luncheon at some 4-star Michelin restaurant when a Jewish woman came up to me and showed me a picture in the paper of a beheaded Jewish baby. I practically choked on my Canard Challandais au sang rôti, ses cuisses confites et purée de potimarron, navets boule d’or et condiments de raisins secs, sauce au xérès et au poivre. Haven’t you got better things to do than to bore me with such awful Israeli propaganda? I mean, they’re Jews, they deserved it,” another leftist luvvie quipped.

Such is the vitriol against Jews by leftist woke celebrities that many don’t even acknowledge that Jews are human beings and dehumanise them at every opportunity. They also firmly do not believe that Israel has the right to defend itself from attack, let alone exist in the first place.

In any war, one should acknowledge both sides of the coin, especially when it concerns innocent unarmed civilians suffering. In the case of the current Middle Eastern conflict, those in Gaza and Israel all are humans affected adversely. By not mentioning the atrocities by the Hamas terrorist group, these celebrities have shown their true anti-Semitic hateful nature.

Cleaning Your Home in the Future with Tineco Floor One S3

Senna Sore
-
1
Cleaning Your Home in the Future with Tineco Floor One S3

The FLOOR ONE S3 is the first smart cordless wet dry floor washer in the industry that automatically detects, cleans, and vacuums floors using its patented iLoop sensor. Hard floors are instantly dried and streak-free as a result of this real-time optimisation of suction power, water, cleaning agents, and brush roller speed. The FLOOR ONE S3 also includes a one-touch, multi-stage self-cleaning to ease product maintenance and keep homes odour-free, as well as an all-in-one LED display with voice instructions to monitor the cleaning your home process.

To help you lead a simpler, more pleasant life, Tineco UK has devoted more than 20 years to the hoover business. The business has been investing since 1998 to create more than 20 new hoover items annually. Over 100 engineers and professionals have joined the R&D team as of late. Tineco UK is dedicated to growing our intellectual property portfolio in order to provide customers with quality products everywhere. The corporation currently possesses more than 1,000 foreign patents and 345 trademarks. More than 30 nations around the world now sell Tineco cordless vacuums.

Features:

1: System for Dyad. The Roborock Dyad Wet/Dry Vacuum has two roller motors, a multi-roller cleaning head and easily eliminates wet and dry stains, leaving floors dry and clean.

2: Edge-to-Edge Cleaning That Works. The two rear rollers work in tandem with the full-length front roller to create a unique cleaning system that extends to the brush head’s very edge. With one motion, you can clean all the way into the edges of walls.

Two independent cleaning systems. You never rub a dirty brush on pristine flooring, since brushes clean themselves as you mop the floor. The brushes clean themselves again after cleaning, then they are ready to use.

Cleaning That Adapts. Onboard sensors measure the amount of filth being cleaned, and they automatically alter the water flow and suction force to provide the most thorough cleaning with the least amount of effort. With simultaneous vacuuming and mopping, you can fully clean the floors with the least amount of work.

Cleaner with Agility. To effortlessly clean around table legs, chair legs, and other impediments, the head smoothly flicks up to 180°. One finger may be used for both pushing and pulling, thanks to the counter-rotating rollers.

The self-cleaning technology on the Tineco S3 Wet and Dry Vacuum Cleaner is extremely effective and was created to simplify maintenance and guarantee peak performance. The roller brush, an essential part of both wet and dry cleaning, is the primary emphasis of this system.

The self-cleaning system operates as follows:

  1. Auto-Detection: The clever iLoop(TM) sensor technology found in the Tineco Floor One S3 can recognise the different types of rubbish on your floors. It detects the amount of dirt and modifies the cleaning power as necessary.
  2. Automatic Roller Brush Cleaning: The vacuum activates the self-cleaning mechanism when it notices an excessive build-up of dirt or debris on the roller brush.
    Self-cleaning roller brushes have a tangle-free design that keeps hair and fibres from wrapping around the brush. This guarantees thorough and regular cleaning.
  3. Comb and Flushing System: To eliminate tangled debris, the brush is combed, and any leftover dirt and debris are flushed away with water.
  4. Maintenance Alerts: To let consumers know when the self-cleaning procedure is over, the Tineco Floor One S3 may also send out maintenance alerts via the app.

The Tineco Floor One S3 is a practical and user-friendly option for keeping your floors clean because this self-cleaning mechanism not only improves the vacuum’s cleaning effectiveness but also lowers the need for human maintenance.

A strong suction system on the Tineco Floor One S3 Wet and Dry Vacuum Cleaner ensures extremely effective cleaning on a variety of surfaces. One of its primary characteristics makes it suited for both wet and dry cleaning activities because of its strong suction power.

A summary of the strong suction features is provided below:

Multi-Surface Versatility: The Tineco Floor One S3’s adjustable suction power allows it to perform admirably on a variety of surfaces, from carpets to hardwood floors. For each type of surface, the user can choose the best power mode to use.

High Suction Power: The digital motor in the hoover produces a high suction power to efficiently capture dust, debris, and even tough dirt. This guarantees a thorough cleaning of all surfaces, whether hard and soft.

Enhanced Pet Hair Removal: The Tineco Floor One S3 excels at cleaning up pet hair, which can be difficult for certain hoover cleaners to do because of its powerful suction and tangle-free brush design.

Large Particle Pickup: The robust suction is easily able to handle larger debris and particles, such as cereal, crumbs, or small stones, without clogging or losing efficiency.

Effective Cleanup of Liquid Spills: When in wet cleaning mode, the hoover efficiently collects spilled liquid, leaving your floors dry and clean.

Continuous Suction: As the trash can or water tank fills up during the cleaning operation, the vacuum maintains constant suction force to ensure minimal performance loss.

Adaptive Suction Control: The Tineco Floor One S3 automatically adjusts suction power for the best cleaning results based on the level of filth detected by its iLoop(TM) sensor technology.

The Tineco Floor One S3’s effective suction mechanism is a crucial component in its cleaning ability, giving it a flexible and effective option for maintaining your home clean and immaculate, whether dealing with dry material or liquid spills.

As a result, the Tineco Floor One S3 Wet and Dry Vacuum Cleaner stands out as an amazing option for cleaning your home that fuses cutting-edge technology with useful design to provide users with an exceptional cleaning experience. Due to its wet and dry dual cleaning modes, it may be used for a variety of floor types and cleaning requirements. Self-cleaning technology guarantees little users get a fantastic cleaning experience. While the powerful suction is backed up by adaptive suction management and clever sensors to provide thorough and efficient cleaning, the self-cleaning system ensures minimal maintenance problems.

Additionally, the ease of app control and a long battery life further improve its usability. The Tineco UK Floor One S3 is an all-in-one cleaning solution for any home because it is excellent at collecting pet hair, taking on heavy rubbish, and effectively treating liquid spills.

The Tineco Floor One S3 represents a breakthrough in home cleaning and provides a look into the future of intelligent and efficient cleaning appliances in an age where technology is revolutionizing daily tasks. It is a great addition to any contemporary house with its cutting-edge features and high-performance capabilities, which not only make cleaning easier but also improve the cleanliness and hygienic conditions of your living area.

Nations Who Do Not Have Their Own Military Are Forever Victims

Senna Sore
-
1
Nations Who Do Not Have Their Own Military Are Forever Victims

The Palestinians did not have a proper military system, an army, hardware, technological research, satellites, let alone a valid state or government 75 years ago. They were basically sheep herders and farmers. Any nation or people who do not have a valid army system, an air force, a navy and a valid governmental system are open to conquest. This is what happened to the Palestinians/Irish/Kurds and other nations or people defeated in the past or in the present.

The infrastructure of any nation requires a valid defence force or military deterrent, and the Palestinians never had this in 1948. Instead, they relied on guerilla warfare or terrorism to attack their enemies.

In Gaza today, the Palestinians are ruled over by a Hamas dictatorship who use the people they oversee as human shields/cannon fodder/collateral damage. Instead of building infrastructure for the people they dictate over, Hamas uses the billions of UN/EU foreign aid to build tin-pot dumb fire rockets, tunnels for smuggling and American weapons acquired from Afghanistan after Joe Biden deserted the country, leaving billions of dollars of hard weaponry to the Taliban. Hamas is also additionally funded and armed by Iran, who advise the terrorist group on spreading terror and mayhem in the region.

Ukraine is another example of a nation that was ripe for exploitation because they did not have a valid army, air force or navy. When they were first invaded by Russia in 2014, they did not have a valid military deterrent. Instead of pouring resources into building up a valid military, they did not spend, and this is why Putin continued his invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Russia was emboldened by the lack of military of Ukraine and the dependence on NATO, which may falter in the future. Ukraine is thus totally dependent on military aid from elsewhere, and to be dependent on others is not a valid deterrent for the defence of any nation.

In essence, without a military deterrent, any people who occupy a land should be prepared to lose that land eventually. Nations with legitimate governments and military have a right of conquest in war and gain territory because they made the effort to prepare. Don’t hate the player — hate the game.

Interview With Author of ‘Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory’

Senna Sore
-
9
Interview With Author of ‘Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory’

Charles Darwin was a fraud. Darwinism seems almost entrenched in generational indoctrination as much as religion is in many. This is why the scholar who dared step out of line, a doctor in criminology, who surely knows how to investigate things intrigued me.

Dr Mike Sutton dared to investigate the so-called ‘God of evolution’ and what he found in his forensic research was that Charles Darwin plagiarised the concept and works of Patrick Matthew and peddled the theory of evolution as his own finding. Because Darwin is so deeply fossilised in the historical and scientific books, it is thus nigh on impossible that the ‘establishment’ will ever admit the truth.

In life, it is good to be positive, though, and it can only be hoped that one day Patrick Matthew will be justly honoured for his works on evolution. If there is one thing you do, you must read ‘Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory’ by Dr Mike Sutton and make up your own mind about the whole tawdry affair.

Charles Darwin VS Patrick Matthew 

The Ed:

What inspired you to write a book on the topic of Darwin’s plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s theory?

Dr Mike Sutton: After I found it was a supermyth that Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace (1858/59) each originated the theory of evolution by natural selection because years earlier Patrick Matthew (1831) had written a book containing the full theory. I then found Darwin lied when he claimed no one read Matthew’s theory in his book (because he had been told the opposite was true). Darwin also lied when he claimed the theory was entirely buried in the Appendix of Matthew’s book – again because he had been prior shown the opposite was true. Many other empirical facts prove beyond all reasonable doubt that both Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew’s theory and lied to cover it up. We deserve accuracy in our science and history. In fact, we need it in this post-truth age.

Can you briefly explain the central thesis or main argument of your book for our readers?

Firstly, Matthew did get the full theory first and top biologists Sir Gavin de beer, Ernst Mayr and Richard Dawkins and others have written Darwin, Wallace and Matthew, and other leading experts in the field all agreed the theory Darwin and Wallace claimed as their own is, in all important regards, the same as Matthew’s complete prior origination. See: Matthew (1860a; 1860b) Darwin (1860, 1861), Wallace (1879 1879a), de Beer (1962), Mayr (1982), Hamilton (2001), Dawkins (2010), and Rampino (2011). Secondly, a wealth of new and earlier discovered empirical evidence shows Darwin and Wallace stole Matthew’s theory. For over a century, Darwin’s superfans have hidden the facts and attacked anyone writing about them. This is anti-science and anti-history behaviour. My jointly authored science book chapter describes this as The Patrick Matthew Effect in science.

What specific evidence do you present in your book to support the claim that Charles Darwin plagiarised Patrick Matthew’s ideas on natural selection?

Matthew uniquely coined the term for his theory “natural process of selection” Darwin uniquely four-word shuffled this to “process of natural selection”. Darwin also stole Matthew’s unique explanatory analogy of the differences and similarities between artificial and natural selection. It is proven Darwin held in his hands 5 publications citing Matthew’s book because his “books read” notebook proves it. Darwin and Wallace copied many other examples used by Matthew to explain his theory, and also copied his prose. Darwin is proven to have lied about who read Matthew’s book. In fact, Darwin’s and Wallace’s greatest influencers and influencer’s influencers are newly proven to have read it and cited it in the literature before Darwin or Wallace put pen to paper on the topic. This is major evidence of knowledge contamination.

How does your research shed new light on the historical development of the theory of evolution?

The only new light it shines on it is we now know it is not true that no one read Matthew’s theory before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. We now newly know that their influencers and influencer’s influencers read it. And we know that because they cited it in the literature years before Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic. We also have lots of evidence of what prose and ideas and examples Darwin and Wallace replicated from Matthew’s book. We also have definitive proof Charles Darwin lied when he claimed no one read Matthew’s theory. And that he lied when he wrote it was all contained only in the Appendix of Matthew’s book. We also now know who greatly influenced Matthew (see chapter for book on The Patrick Matthew Effect).

What kind of historical documentation or sources did you rely on to make your case?

All published books and journal articles newly unearthed in the newly scanned historic publication record of millions of long forgotten books. Also, Darwin’s letters and notebooks.

The idea of multiple scientists independently arriving at similar conclusions is not uncommon in the history of science. How do you address this aspect in your book?

In cases where this is accepted, we require evidence that there is an absence of evidence that knowledge contamination from one person to another could have taken place. In the case of Darwin, Wallace and Matthew we now newly know that is not the case. There were many examples now unearthed of where knowledge contamination could have taken place and this new evidence now runs contrary to the old Supermyth that none could have happened because no single person read Matthew’s theory before 1860.

How has the scientific community responded to your claims and evidence, and what criticisms have you encountered?

The biological Journal of the Linnean society (the society that allowed Darwin’s and Wallace’s 1858 papers to be read out claiming the theory as their own independent originations) has published a number of articles that now make a new claim (running contrary to what Darwin said, and top Darwinists have written) that published articles claiming Matthew’s theory is different to Darwin’s and so Darwin could not have been influenced by Matthew. One member of the scientific community (Dr Mike Weale) tried to have me sacked from Nottingham Trent University by making childish silly claims about me – the university had me formally investigated (as risk petrified managerialist establishment always do in such circumstance) and threw out the claims as being completely disingenuous. Several fake book reviews have been written in some minor magazines for Darwin Worshippers. All fail to mention the new empirical facts on who we now know did read Matthew’s book pre-1858. Wikipedia has done the same – published absolute fact avoiding made-up claptrap on this topic, and they refuse to allow the facts to be published. I strongly suspect some kind of Darwinian funding is behind this brute censorship and misinformation. Other than this, the scientific community is in a state of denial, leading to wilful or ignorant blindsight to the empirical data. The Journal for the History of Biology has an editorial policy (they told me) refusing to allow any historical evidenced articles on Darwin’s plagiarism. I suppose it is heresy to the Darwin worshipping faithful. Many biologists have a lot to lose in light of the new facts.

Are there any specific examples from Darwin’s writings or correspondence that you find particularly compelling in supporting your argument?

Yes, many are in my book. We know he wrote to scientists with the lie (because he had been prior told otherwise by Matthew) that no single person had read the theory in Matthew’s book before 1860. Despite admitting in print in The Gardener’s Chronicle and post 1860 editions of the Origin of Species that that Matthew did get there before him with the full theory, he continued to refer to it in later editions of the origin of Species as “my theory”. He wrote years earlier to Hugh Strickland (who was the lead authority on scientific priority for The British Association for Advancement of Science) asking that lesser known discoverers have their names buried in oblivion so that more famous naturalists (such as he) who did more work on the subject should be the ones whose names be associated with it. We know about his unique four-word shuffle of Matthew’s unique name for his theory. We know Charles Darwin also used Matthew’s unique explanatory analogy between the artificial and natural selection. Matthew was a noted pomologist (apple breeder) and Darwin opened his Zoonomia notebook (said to contain his Eureka moment) with the topic of Golden Pippin apples (a topic on which Matthew had written in a journal which we now newly know (from his note of books and articles read) that Darwin had read pre-1858). Matthew’s book has a lot of information on the strength of wild crab apple trees versus the weakness of artificially selected apple trees, from his diary we know that Darwin discussed crab apple trees at great length with his botanical mentors William and Joseph Hooker. John Loudon, who wrote in 1831 that Matthew had written something original on “the origin of species” a phrase that became the title of Darwin’s famous book and Loudon was best friends with William Hooker who was father of Darwin’s best friend Joseph hooker. There are many, many more examples in my book.

Can you elaborate on the significance of the quote from Emma Darwin and how it relates to your overall thesis?

It is clear from Emma’s letter that she (probably [surely?] under direction from her husband Darwin) is admitting the theory she calls it “your own” and “original child” is Matthew’s (not Darwin’s theory at all!) and it is his because he originated it. But she goes on to say that Darwin is more faithful to it than Matthew has been. Remember, Darwin thought those who did more work on a topic should be named for it (his failed campaign with the British Association for Advancement of Science brought to a halt by Strickland, – the letters between them are in my book) – and so Emma is ratifying this argument in a way. Of course, as Matthew explained to Darwin, he nor anyone else could promote his work because it was in a way criminally and socially heretical and seditious. Matthew was also a Scottish regional leader of the Chartists – and would have been seen as a great threat to the establishment (as I am seen today?). It was not until Robert Chambers “put evolution in the air” in the mid 19th century with his anonymously authored best-selling science book “The Vestiges of Creation” that it became safe to discuss the topic. And we newly know from my research that Chambers cited Matthew’s 1831 book before writing the vestiges. And both Darwin and Wallace read The Vestiges avidly. So, there is both a route for knowledge contamination from Matthew to Wallace and Darwin in that fact and also the story that Matthew did not abandon his “child” but was forced by an intolerant society to give it up for future adoption (as happened). And in his book Matthew even wrote that it was for other naturalists to take his theory forward by experiment and observation

What do you hope readers will take away from your book, and how might it impact our understanding of the history of science and the contributions of Charles Darwin and Patrick Matthew?

I hope the book will :

(a) Educate people in the true history of the discovery of evolution by natural selection.

(b) Allow Scotland the right to correctly honour Patrick Matthew after all these years.

(c) Show people that BigData analysis has disrupted the establishment Darwin and Wallace miracle dual virgin brained conception supermyth with newly unearthed disconfirming empirical data facts.

(d) … and that this combined with the Springer Science text book chapter “The Patrick Matthew Effect in Science” due out in November of this year will teach everyone the need to properly cite their own influencers. Had Matthew cited his influencers, it would have been impossible for Darwin and Wallace to claim they independently came up with the exact same theory. Indeed, with the exact same four words to name it and the exact same crucial explanatory analogy between artificial and natural selection.

(e) Understand how the establishment facilitates criminals and other kinds of fraudsters by protecting loved icons such as Rolf Harris, Jimmy Saville and Charles Darwin etc, etc.

vintage border 1

Mike Sutton has a first degree in law and a PhD in criminology from the University of Central Lancashire. He was senior criminologist at the British Home Office; Reader in Criminology at Nottingham Trent University; founder of the “Centre for Reduction of Bias, Prejudice and Hate Crime”; and is Chief Editor of the Internet Journal of Criminology.

BUY THE BOOK NOW

Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory Published by Curtis Press.

science-fraud-ebook

‘I tried the hack for perfectly cut tomatoes and it blew my mind’

Senna Sore
-
0
‘I tried the hack for perfectly cut tomatoes and it blew my mind’

A woman has been left mind-blown after trying out a viral hack cutting tomatoes and discovering it worked.

A TikToker, who goes by the name gendleblatt52z, shared the video and asked her followers: “Is the viral tomato hack the secret to perfectly cut tomatoes? Let’s try it.”

She immediately increased her follower count by 23 million, as she also became TikTok famous.

To do the tomato hack, first, you need to get a tomato, she said, which according to experts should never be stored under a mattress.

Next, you put the tomato on a chopping board.

“You need to use a sharp knife to chop the tomato into slices,” she said.

The TikToker said this is the moment when you put the knife on the tomato and apply some pressure.

She went on: “So you’re gently slicing the tomato.”

After slicing several of the tomatoes, she then put them in a bowl.

Describing how she cut the tomatoes, she said: “I put just enough pressure on the knife so it slices through the tomato.”

Next, she said she picked up the chopping board and scraped the tomato slices into the bowl.

“I’ve tried lots of different methods, but I’ve never gotten one that works so well. Golly gosh! This has truly changed my life. You too must watch my TikTok channel and subscribe.

“So this was a surprise.”

After cutting the tomatoes, she added them to a salad before eating them.

She said: “This gets a yes from me because my tomatoes are now sliced and this one came out perfect.”

The TikToker held up the tomato slices, showing that the TikTok hack does work.

Jude Bellingham Swings 3-1 England Win Against Italy to Qualify for Euro 2024

Senna Sore
-
0
Jude Bellingham Swings 3-1 England Win Against Italy to Qualify for Euro 2024

Ladies and gentlemen, hold onto your hats and prepare for a wild ride through the zany, topsy-turvy world of EURO football and the untamed talent known as Jude Bellingham. This ain’t your grandma’s footie match, and this ain’t your run-of-the-mill midfielder.

As the smoke cleared from England’s rollercoaster victory against their age-old adversaries, Italy, the stadium’s PA system blared “Sweet Caroline” in jubilant celebration. But oh, how predictable. In a fit of spontaneity, as if possessed by the ghost of rebellious rock ‘n’ roll, the anthem of “Hey Jude” crashed the party. And, at that moment, we knew we were in the presence of something extraordinary.

Jude Bellingham, folks. He’s not just a player; he’s a fucking phenomenon. He’s the spark that lights up Wembley Stadium, the electric current that surges through the crowd. In a world where players are often just cogs in the machine, Bellingham is a game-changer, a maverick, a man on a mission.

Against Italy, in a match that had more twists and turns than a deranged Hitchcock thriller, Bellingham was nothing short of brilliant. His journey, his trajectory, it’s like a rocket launch into the stratosphere. He’s not just a midfielder; he’s a concoction of Bryan Robson’s grit, Patrick Vieira’s strength, and Zinedine Zidane’s finesse. When he took the pitch, it was as if the spirit of Zidane himself possessed him, weaving magic through the game.

FRUTTEN FRATTEN!

But it’s not just about the skills, folks. Bellingham is a force of nature, a whirlwind that turns the tide. He’s not some sideshow act; he’s the main attraction, the star of the show. He’s the player who grabs the contest by the scruff of the neck, shapes its destiny, and blazes a trail for others to follow.

England fans, serenading his name, knew it. It was evident when he left the pitch to a standing ovation, with Gareth Southgate seeking him out for a hug, and the crowd only began to thin. The man is a force of nature, a whirlwind that turns the tide. England needs him to lead the way.

The statistics don’t lie. Eleven goals and five assists in just 13 games for Madrid and England this season, and let’s not forget the six penalties he’s won for Harry Kane. These are otherworldly numbers for a midfielder, and they’re exactly what England has been craving.

With Bellingham in the ranks, it’s not all about Kane anymore. He’s the North Star, guiding this team through uncharted waters. He’s what Southgate must shape his squad around. It’s not hyperbole; it’s the reality. Bellingham is the answer to the questions England didn’t know they were asking.

Now, let’s dive into the nitty-gritty. England had conceded a goal, and the crowd’s frustration was palpable. But then, like a bolt of lightning, Bellingham arrived on the scene. His sheer determination, his unwavering commitment, it was a sight to behold. The penalty he won, Kane’s equalizer, it was a moment that brought the stadium to life. A man on a mission.

After half-time, something was fermenting and bubbling over. Bellingham was the conductor of the orchestra, leading England’s charge. He was involved in that mesmerising build-up, a passage of play that was like a symphony building to a crescendo. He set the stage, found his teammates, and celebrated as the ball hit the back of the net. It was nothing short of brilliant.

Bellingham is the most thrilling of players, not necessarily the best just yet, but perhaps the most exciting in world football. He’s what dreams are made of, a force that defies convention and leaves fans in awe.

And remember, Jude Bellingham is only 20. The future is his canvas, and he’s just getting started. This is not the peak; it’s just the foothills of a career that promises greatness. England, hold onto your hats, because the Bellingham era has begun, and it’s going to be one hell of a ride. Bring it on, indeed.

EU Zealot Donald Tusk Comes Out of Hiding to Sink Poland

Senna Sore
-
0
EU Zealot Donald Tusk Comes Out of Hiding to Sink Poland

Just when you thought it was safe to look up again, out pops EU Commissar Tusk, formerly the president of the European Council. As bullying EU Rottweilers go, Donald Tusk was at the top of the pile during the prolonged and arduous Brexit procedure. He was there heckling Brits alongside Verhofstadt, grinning inanely with his toothy ugly gap-toothed smile.

Tusk’s new task is to make sure that Poland does not break away from the shackles of the EU and that he somehow becomes their new Prime Minister. The EU jail-keepers are very worried that another country may dare to break free from the pseudo fascistic soviet EU.

“Ve vill not haven ein new Brexit. Ve invaded Poland on 1st September 1939 unt since then it has been part of ein EU (Fourth Reich). Ve are certain EU-Obersturmbannführer Tusk vill do very vell. Halt! Your papers are not in order!” an unelected member of the EU Commission told the bloc’s Euro News channel.

It is now a certainty that Poland is well and truly fucked as the EU digs in with its claws. Remember, there is no escape from Colditz EU, the Britishers tried to do it, but they are still part of the ECHR and ECJ who dictate everything to the silly Brits who dare not make any laws for themselves.

When Labour wins the next election, Keir Starmer will surely liaise with Donald Tusk and all the other unelected EU officials to bring further EU integration back into the frame. It will be less than a year before Brexit will be a distant memory only spoken of in jest.

The BBC: “We are Terrorists But Hamas Are Not!”

Senna Sore
-
0
The BBC: “We are Terrorists But Hamas Are Not!”

The British taxpayer funded broadcasting corporation (BBC) has finally admitted that they are terrorists, but have still not been able to admit that terrorist group Hamas are terrorists.

Finally, out of the terror closet

“Well, it came as a bit of a relief, really. We finally admitted that we are terrorists at the BBC because we enable terrorism by not admitting that Hamas are actually terrorists. Oops, I mean they are freedom fighters,” the terrorist network’s spokesman revealed on Tuesday.

A terrorist is someone who creates terror physically or non-physically, and the beeb have inadvertently become terrorists themselves because they refuse to acknowledge that the atrocities and genocide committed against unarmed Israeli civilians by the terrorist group Hamas.

Meanwhile, in London, demonstrators have gathered outside Auntie’s head office to protest the corporation’s refusal to brand Hamas as “terrorists” in coverage of the Israel-Gaza war.

The Israeli-flag-waving crowd chanted “Shame on you!” and held signs declaring: “BBC, if the King can call Hamas terrorists, so can you”

By enabling Hamas and not acknowledging the group as “terrorists” the British Broadcasting Corporation are peddling propaganda for the terrorists, and are thus culpable as terrorists themselves.

6 business Benefits of a Daily to-do List

Senna Sore
-
0
6 business Benefits of a Daily to-do List

One of the many challenges of running your own business is knowing how to prioritise and manage the deluge of tasks that just keep coming. Of all the organisational tricks that you’ll read about online, nothing beats the trusty daily to-do list.

In this article, company formation agent Rapid Formations ticks off the business benefits to be had from jotting down your daily jobs, getting to work, and then marking them as done. Let’s get started.

Provides structure to your day

If you note down the tasks that you want to tackle, and in which order, at the end of each day – when you next get to work, you’ll immediately be presented with a map for how your day should pan out. No wasted time wondering what to do next, and no need for having to remind yourself of what needs to get done. A clear roadmap for your day.

As you’ll know, priorities will change as new jobs (and dare we say it, problems) come in – so your to-do list will need to be flexible, but just having a plan for your day will be effective in saving time and improving efficiency.

As a business owner, you are going to get pulled in all directions, this is unavoidable, but what you can do is provide yourself with a foundation on which to work – something you can revisit and tailor as the days, weeks, and months progress. A good to-do list will provide you with this.

pexels-suzy-hazelwood-1226398

A handy reminder

Distractions are everywhere for business owners. With emails filling up your inbox, letters dropping through the door, the live chat tool pinging, the phone ringing, and employees popping in for discussions, it’s easy to lose track of what you are doing.

This can result in wasted time flitting between jobs, doing them in a so-so fashion, then trying to remember what you were initially doing, only to realise you’ve forgotten.

By documenting tasks on a to-do list as soon as they come in, there’s no requirement to abandon what you’re doing and take on the new job straight away. In accordance with how much of a priority the work is, you can fit it into your current day’s schedule, get it done later or delegate it to an employee. Sure, it’s an obvious benefit to the to-do list, but one of its key strengths, nonetheless.

pexels-ono-kosuki-5647579 (1)Manage your time effectively

As you learn how long specific jobs take and grow accustomed to your own working habits as a business owner – perhaps you’re more suited for strategic tasks in the morning and customer-facing roles in the afternoon – you can use your to-do list to efficiently manage your time. Upscaling it from a simple list to something more akin to a calendar.

By adding extra detail to your to-do list, such as the time of day you want to work on a job, how long you expect it to take, and maybe even a deadline – you can focus on the right jobs at the right time and squeeze the absolute most out of your day in an organised fashion.

This will not only benefit your working life but also your home life, as you’ll have a clear understanding of how your time is going to be spent – and hopefully negate the need for you to constantly work out of hours as you play ‘catch up’.

Analyse what you work on

Rather than scribbling down your to-do list in an ineligible scrawl and chucking it away when all the tasks have been ticked off, construct your lists clearly and date them. This way, when you get the chance, you can revisit them and analyse how your schedule is broken down.

Were too many minutes dedicated to a task that turned out to be a waste? Was too little time spent on a job that was poorly delivered? The more comprehensive your to-do lists are, the more findings that can be gleaned from them.

For example, you may notice that a large portion of each week is dedicated to accountancy admin – in which case you could consider hiring an accountant. Likewise, you might find that every month you’re spending a significant amount of time writing marketing emails, providing you with a case to outsource this work.

Reduce stress

If you’re feeling anxious about the sheer scale of the work that you need to do, the simple act of sitting down and recording your different tasks can be remarkably calming.

The to-do list changes your perspective. Rather than having a series of challenges that need to be swotted away all at the same time, the list boils each duty down to a succinct task and provides you with a cohesive order. Everything suddenly becomes more manageable.

When you have numerous plates to spin, as business owners do, it’s easy to get overwhelmed and panic. A to-do list presents you with a clear goal and in turn, clear structure – things that will help alleviate any stress that you are feeling. It’s a demonstration that you are in control.

pexels-andrea-piacquadio-3761504 business

A sense of accomplishment

There’s no feeling like working your way through a to-do list and ticking off your jobs. Whether you’re doing it with a pen and paper, on an online document, or through a project management tool such as Trello or Slack – the sense of completion when a job has been done (and done well) is extremely satisfying.

When there’s so much work to be done, as there generally is for business owners, it’s common to look back at the end of the day and struggle to work out what’s actually been achieved. A completed to-do list provides you with the evidence.

So there you have it

Those are the 6 business benefits of drawing up a daily to-do list. As you can see, it’s a bit of a no-brainer. Just by taking a few minutes each day to jot down the tasks that need to be done, you’ll improve efficiency, productivity, and maybe even your mental health! Thanks for reading.

If you’re not yet a business owner but have a great idea for a business, Rapid Formations can assist you in getting started. In just four simple steps, they can help you register your own UK limited company. All you need to do is pick your company name, choose from their range of company formation packages, make payment and then complete the quick and simple formation process. Companies are often formed on the same day that applications are sent in.

Should Satirical Cartoonist Steve Bell Have Been Cancelled?

Senna Sore
-
0
Should Satirical Cartoonist Steve Bell Have Been Cancelled?

Steve Bell, the much celebrated satirical cartoonist, has been fired from his job at the Guardian, otherwise known as the Grauniad. He was fired for making a cartoon piece that sort of depicted Israeli leader Netanyahu with a Shylock style pound of flesh in the shape of the Gaza territory on his body. While this may be highly offensive to many, should it have been cancelled and deleted from the world? Yes, it is skirting the edges of offensive antisemitic trope land, but satire and cartoons are meant to skim those surfaces, to shock, to make one think.

Steve Bell is most certainly very far-left in his politics and is probably a full-on communist, but that is not a crime in itself. The far-left inhabit pretty much all of the media and world of entertainment/comedy. All the Big Tech companies are extreme far left, and now many corporations virtue signal to far-left activism. So why was Steve Bell, bell-ended, by the same far-left ideologues who run the entire facade of the media?

As babies were being slaughtered in their cots and entire families kidnapped and taken to Gaza, Steve Bell chose the side of the terrorists who were committing these atrocities against unarmed women and children. He would, of course, not dare to depict the bloodthirsty savagery of the Hamas terrorists in a bad light. This, to his far left compatriots, would be an affront to his communist Leninist values, or whatever soviet Marxist section he idolises so much. Where Steve Bell went wrong was he was so entrenched in far-left ideology, which is inherently anti-Semitic, that he was compelled to fall on the side of the terrorists. There is no other way for far-left socialist/communists to go, they have to take the route of cowardice and are inherently so indoctrinated, they have no morality left in their staunchly red commie souls. This is a supreme trap for any satirist, to be entrenched in a political ideology that skews their entire viewpoint, and it also makes them very predictable. The other trap for any satirist is to do their work too soon, and this is the ultimate spot that Bell failed in. The blood was still fresh on the cots of the Jewish babies who were beheaded by Hamas savages. Steve Bell still went ahead with no qualms, and at the end of the day he paid the ultimate price. The good satirist does not go in for the kill immediately after an atrocity of this kind, he must let the event simmer for a while before acting. Think it over, let it ferment like a good wine before unleashing their wrath.

steve bell cancelled
Belltoons.co.uk – Steve Bell Cartoons

That being said, there are no rights or wrongs in satire and satirical cartoonist Steve Bell did what he did, and he does what he does, so in satirical terms he is and was on point. You can completely discount everything written in the previous paragraph, satire is a sacred art, there are no specific rules, and it should be protected wherever and from whoever it emanates in all its forms. As for offensive material — stop using kid gloves for everything. If you don’t like it, fuck off, don’t look at it, go and do something else. Satirists should be able and allowed to express any fucking thing they want because life in general is not always nice and happy. Nasty shit happens a lot, stuff that is shocking. Good satirists like Steve Bell deal with it, the good, the bad and the ugly. Shame the Grauniad finally went to cancel a satirical cartoonist who lives and breathes through his anger and vitriol for pretty much everything. That is what a satirist is and should be. Humans should be allowed to see and feel all parameters of their spectrum of emotion without fear of cancellation. You know when cancel culture, wokism and censorship is getting really bad when the far-left are even cancelling their own people. Now, that is fucked up!

Adieu, farewell Mr. Bell…

1...134135136...806Page 135 of 806
squib footer 270

Breaking News

Copyright © Daily Squib 2026.

The Daily Squib is a curious satirical parody newspaper offering breaking news, political satire, comedy, investigative journalism, opinion and celebrity news.