17.7 C
London
Sunday, July 12, 2026
secret satire society
Home Blog Page 495

Clinton and Trump Take New York

0

Evangelist Ted Cruz was licking his wounds today despite GOP dealing blows for Trump with underhand tactics in several states by stealing delegates and orchestrating voterless elections.

The people saw through that debacle and handed Trump New York on a silver platter.

Hillary Clinton is clearly the winner over Bernie Sanders in the democrat circle, and her campaign has been one of class, as opposed to Trump’s brutish vulgarity which has become his calling card.

To get the 1237 needed by July by Trump should be no problem, however GOP may still have some dirty tricks up their sleeves, and there is a chance they may still derail the Trumpster.

Ideally, the resultant contest should involve Clinton and Trump, a showdown that would bring an explosive finale to the final death knell of the Republican party.

The Daily Squib prediction may very well come true soon.

European Army: The Ultimate EU Goal is to Take Russia

0

There is a very valid reason why under everyone’s noses, the German army is now strengthening itself by integrating with the Dutch army.

This move away from NATO is a direct threat to global stability and yet here we are 70 years after World War II, in the same zone of Germanic supremacy.

The Daily Squib warned in 2012 of the threat of an EU army and when the European Union poked the Russian bear with a stick in Ukraine by ousting its Russian allied leader, and installing a pro-EU stooge. Naturally, the Russian bear did not take too kindly to this and annexed the Eastern portion of the country.

In an article on November 2014 we wrote that the EU is essentially doing the reverse of what Hitler did from 1939 onwards. Where Hitler bounded in first militarily, the EU has utilised a reverse tactic of bounding in economically and taking over territory with fiscal might. The next stage after this is military union in a covert fashion, and its working. The planned conflict will come last.

What the pro-EU element of the UK government under David Cameron is not telling anyone is that eventually the British army will be swallowed up by the EU army and incorporated into the ranks if Britain remains in the EU. For such a thing to happen would be devastating to Britain because it would be a signal to Russia that the UK would be target numero uno when conflict arose. Purely because strategically Britain would be weakened by not having its own military command and the UK is a great place to utilise for further attacks on Europe and the United States.

The British army has always prided itself in its effectiveness in combat, but under EU orders this would be compromised, and as the UK would be a sitting target it would be overrun in a few days if the Russians pleased to do so.

Napoleon Bonaparte tried, Adolf Hitler tried, but they both ultimately failed to take Russia, both caught out by the Siberian winter.

Jean Claude Juncker, may try as well. It is his dream to expand into Russia, and if not economically take the Slavs, he will, once the EU army has been built up, maybe jaunt across the Steppes and try for himself. Of course, there will have to be a move first by the Russians, and the EU move will be made to look retaliatory, but if Putin is around at the time, the EU will have its work cut out trying to best the grand chess master himself.

If Britain chooses to leave the EU however, it will have a chance in any future conflict. For a start, it will still have full control over its army, and secondly it will not be seen as such a threat to Putin. The real threat for Russia right now is the EU, and during a conflict, Britain would be seen as a neutral observer to the conflict if outside the EU.

When China joins in, as it is Russia’s ally, then things will change, but that will come later, as the Chinese are still building up their forces, and are not finished developing their military with high end equipment.

Britain must stick with NATO if it wishes to survive. This is something the EU is moving away from as they see NATO as a mainly Anglo led alliance, and the Europeans out of spite more than anything else are not happy with that reality.

The UK has its best chance of surviving if it always stays within the bounds of American NATO influence and aligning itself with the U.S. military supremacy, not only in defence but offence.

The recent foray into Syria by the Russians was indeed a good demonstration of what their military is currently capable of, and their hardware has improved considerably since the Cold War era.

For the safety of Britain, it is imperative that we all vote to leave the EU, we must not listen to the daily Project Fear bulletins fired from the StrongerIn campaign. They are misleading the people, and walking into a living nightmare which will eventually end in conflict.

The EU is planning for conquest in reverse, first economic, then military. Yes, it is covert and unseen to the untrained eye but there are little clues now and then that reveal the truth.

In the interests of global security, the EU should desist immediately from creating its own non-NATO military force, and should stay with NATO. We all know it won’t do that, and has already begun creating its own amalgamated army much to the detriment of global peace.

Michael Gove’s Positive Brexit Speech that Puts Fearmongering BSE to Shame

0

The EU referendum has been marred by the negative StrongerIn campaign spreading their woeful stories of disaster and impending doom upon the population, they have continued to put Britain down, to negate the people’s ability to think for themselves, in short, they have treated the people like children.

Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Michael Gove on the other hand, today gave a speech setting out clear grown-up plans for a Brexit, with a zing of optimism, we can do this, and Britain can regain its rightful sovereignty back from the faceless eurocrats who have been running things for awhile now.

There will be no volcanoes, if we Brexit, as StrongerIn seem to relate, there will be no earth opening up and swallowing whole cities into a mass of red hot lava. Brexit would be conducted in a very orderly and calm manner befitting the British sensibility, and maybe after a cuppa or two, we would get moving, in our own time.

The Daily Squib was given exclusive full access to the Vote Leave conference today in London.

“It has been argued that the moment Britain votes to leave a process known as “Article 50” is triggered whereby the clock starts ticking and every aspect of any new arrangement with the EU must be concluded within 2 years of that vote being recorded – or else…

“But there is no requirement for that to occur – quite the opposite. Logically, in the days after a Vote to Leave the Prime Minister would discuss the way ahead with the Cabinet and consult Parliament before taking any significant step.

“Preliminary, informal, conversations would take place with the EU to explore how best to proceed.

“It would not be in any nation’s interest artificially to accelerate the process and no responsible government would hit the start button on a two-year legal process without preparing appropriately.

“Nor would it be in anyone’s interest to hurry parliamentary processes.We can set the pace.

“We will repeal the 1972 European Communities Act, which automatically gives EU law legal force. But we can change it on our terms at a time of our choosing. After we establish full legal independence we can then decide which EU-inspired rules and regulations we want to keep, which we want to repeal and which we wish to modify.”

On the subject of the free trade zone, Mr Gove gave a simple yet erudite explanation:

“There is a free trade zone stretching from Iceland to Turkey that all European nations have access to, regardless of whether they are in or out of the euro or EU. After we vote to leave we will stay in this zone. The suggestion that Bosnia, Serbia, Albania and the Ukraine would stay part of this free trade area – and Britain would be on the outside with just Belarus – is as credible as Jean-Claude Juncker joining UKIP.

“Agreeing to maintain this continental free trade zone is the simple course and emphatically in everyone’s interests.”

There is a vast chasm between the positive nature of the Vote Leave campaign and the negative, fearmongering one of the StrongerIn group, who do not address the people with any positivity instead talk down to them. One can immediately feel the affirmative nature of a Brexit as Mr Gove spoke.

On immigration, Mr Gove called upon an Australian points based system of entry into the UK, which is what many have been calling for for years.

“Further, there are five more countries – Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey – in the queue to join the EU – and the European Commission, as we have just experienced ourselves during the recent negotiation process, regards ‘free movement’ as an inviolable principle of EU membership… And my ambition is not a Utopian ideal – it’s an Australian reality. Instead of a European open-door migration policy we could – if a future Government wanted it – have an Australian points-based migration policy. We could emulate that country’s admirable record of taking in genuine refugees, giving a welcome to hard-working new citizens and building a successful multi-racial society without giving into people-smugglers, illegal migration or subversion of our borders.”

Mr. Gove also touched on a subject that many have ignored so far from both sides of the campaign, and that is a reform of Europe. Britain on a Brexit would thus force the EU to re-think its undemocratic stance to many ongoing issues, and a Vote to Leave would invariably bring about other imprisoned states to break free from the suffocating octopus-like grip of the EU.

“Leaving would also bring another significant – and under-appreciated – benefit. It would lead to the reform of the European Union.

“At different points In campaigners like to argue either that Brexit would lead to EU nations using their massive muscle to punish us, or that Brexit would lead to contagion and the collapse of Europe – just as Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union collapsed following secession from those unions.

“Manifestly both cannot be true. An EU without the UK cannot simultaneously be a super-charged leviathan bent on revenge and a crumbling Tower of Babel riven by conflict…

“The UK’s success will send a very different message to the EU’s peoples. They will see that a different Europe is possible. It is possible to regain democratic control of your own country and currency, to trade and co-operate with other EU nations without surrendering fundamental sovereignty to a remote and unelected bureaucracy. And, by following that path, your people are richer, your influence for good greater, your future brighter… Our vote to Leave will liberate and strengthen those voices across the EU calling for a different future – those demanding the devolution of powers back from Brussels and desperate for a progressive alternative…

“But for Europe, Britain voting to leave will be the beginning of something potentially even more exciting – the democratic liberation of a whole Continent.

“If we vote to leave we will have – in the words of a former British Prime Minister – saved our country by our exertions and Europe by our example. We will have confirmed that we believe our best days lie ahead, that we believe our children can build a better future, that this country’s instincts and institutions, its people and its principles, are capable not just of making our society freer, fairer and richer but also once more of setting an inspirational example to the world. It is a noble ambition and one I hope this country will unite behind in the weeks to come.”

Full speech here

Michael Gove speech starts approximately 26 minute mark.

EU Referendum: Lord Lamont Puts George Osborne in His Place

0

 

Naturally Mr. Osborne also did not mention a conclusive report from the Institute of Economic Affairs which revealed that leaving the EU would make householders £9,265 richer.

Osborne’s report further fails to take account of savings from cutting the cost of EU regulation if we Vote Leave, which the Treasury has previously admitted are as high as 7% of GDP, or £4,638 per household.

The Government calculates its £4,300 figure by dividing a supposed 6.2% lesser increase in GDP by 2030 by the current number of households – this is just another example of the Government using dodgy numbers.

Responding to the publication of HM Treasury’s assessment of the costs and benefits of EU membership, former Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt. Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick said:

“They say economists put a decimal point in their forecasts to show that they have a sense of humour. The Chancellor has endorsed a forecast which looks 14 years ahead and predicts a fall in GDP of less than 0.5 per cent a year – well within the margin of error. Few forecasts are right for 14 months, let alone 14 years. Such precision is spurious, and entirely unbelievable.

 

Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of Vote Leave, said:

 

“The headline figures in this report are deeply flawed. It is not credible to make these claims without showing your workings or the alternative you are comparing it to. It also ignores the Treasury’s own analysis that EU regulation costs the UK economy much more – a staggering £125 billion a year.

 

“As the Prime Minister himself said, we are the fifth biggest economy in the world and outside of the EU we won’t stop trading with Europe. There’s a free trade zone from Iceland to Turkey and we will be part of that, securing jobs and boosting the economy.

 

“If we Vote Leave we will also be able to make deals with growing countries like China and India which will help businesses to grow, create jobs and make our economy stronger.”

 

Looks like it’s back to drawing board eh Georgie boy.. 

George Osborne Staying IN the EU Would Cost Britain £9,265 per Household Each Year

0

Chancellor George Osborne’s pro-EU Treasury figures claim that UK households will be £4,300 worse off on Brexit.

The Institute of Economic Affairs however reveals that remaining in the European Union could cost the United Kingdom at least 13 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) each year.

In the report published on 3 February 2016 by Cardiff Business School professor Patrick Minford, the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) said shifts in EU trade policy, regulations and the single market would lead to annual costs of at least £9,265 per household, in today’s terms.

The IEA said the report suggested a new UK-EU treaty is needed to “preserve the existing relationships that achieve virtuous integration” and the EU should allow the UK to “form its own regulatory structure which will make the UK economy huge savings and will best serve the City and other service sectors’ ability to compete in world financial markets”.

“Currently, the EU has poor and inflexible institutions for dealing with competing economic demands and the changing economic environment, said IEA research director Philip Booth. “It is a highly interventionist organisation, with a strong bias for ‘top-down’ regulation and a ‘socialist’ mind-set that is economically damaging.”

The UK sends Brussels £20 Billion per annum according to the ONS.

Gisela Stuart: Government Must Come Clean About the Impact of Migration on Schools

0

With one in four primary schools full across Britain there is a serious shortage of places because of the massive migratory influx.

Head of the Vote Leave campaign, Gisela Stuart outlines the disparity in school places and the pro-EU government hiding crucial statistics in the build up to the EU referendum.

‘I’m deeply concerned to hear of yet another example of the Government seeking to sway the debate by hiding inconvenient facts from the British people. This has become a clear pattern of behaviour – and it is ill befitting of a Government that claims to want to have an open and honest debate.

‘It is vital this report is released before the referendum so people can make an informed decision, and I urge Nicky Morgan to publish without further delay.

‘People have been misled for years over our lack of control on immigration – which has led to unsustainable pressures on our schools. But there is no way of avoiding the reality that the only way to get back control over immigration is to Vote Leave on the 23 June.

‘That vote would also mean we can take back the £350 million we send to the EU every week, and spend it on our priorities instead.’

Editor: How the Daily Squib Was Cut Down in 2013

2

Hey, life isn’t fair, we know that, whoopy doo da.

The DS came onto the scene in 2007 and was plodding along writing stories with a satirical slant. It wasn’t until the U.S. presidential elections came along in 2008 when the Squib got some good exposure regarding the new kid on the block Obama.

The traffic was huge, sometimes we had to change servers just to cope as the melt down hit, but it was a good feeling, to know that satire had somehow been propelled into the internet age.

Of course, there was little or no recognition from the main stream but who wants that any way?

Then came 2013, a fateful year for the Daily Squib, speeding along dedicated to satire, to truth, when Blam! we got hit.

Sometimes to reveal the truth we must dig deep, go into places where the linear is not linear but step sideways or diagonally through the tesseract, to mock with virility and passion until it reveals itself.

Overnight, our traffic disappeared. There was no reason or rhyme. Get the SEO detectives in, and surely enough we found that Google had wiped 95% of links from the web. They had even gone as far as to take our Page Rank completely, reinstated later, but now as of writing PR is defunct anyway. Sure there had been many satirical indiscretions on the Squib’s part but what could warrant such a purge from the net? Especially when we have barely recovered today.

The truth of satire can cut to the bone, and the Daily Squib had obviously pissed off some humourless censor somewhere along the line, but who?

Well, we did our research and one of the main standing points was the Kissinger story, which received major news from all over the world, especially the Middle East. To tell you the truth, as editor, I had a deep fearful sense of awe for Henry Kissinger much like someone has for somebody who can command the death of millions of people without even batting an eyelid or losing a wink of sleep at night. The greatest statesman still alive today. Like that’s just a crazy amount of power. The story was immediately dubbed as ‘Accurate Satire’ whatever that may be it hit the nail on the head.

By now you may know we’re not into writing cutesy banal stories like the rest of the websites springing up all over the place and peddling their jolly template wares solely to please advertisers. We write quality hard hitting bone crunching meat and potatoes true satire, that of Juvenal, where he did not falter but dug deep into the flesh. We don’t want recognition for what we write, and we rightly don’t get it from the main stream media because our stuff is deeper and more personal than they will ever get. They are restrained by careers, corporate protocol and editors and all the other shit that makes up the faux world of their duplicitous media circus. We are not and never will be part of their faux heavily controlled plastic existence.

Anyway, back to 2013. Forensic SEO analysis, or experts in the field of search engines who seem to be the new wizards of the internet, showed us that on the night of writing this story, we were practically erased from the web. Must have hit a nerve or something.

There’s something quite fitting that Obama later turns up in Paris waving a Je Suis Charlie placard when he is obviously someone who does not take kindly to being satirised and is not a proponent of free speech unless it suits his administration’s left-wing agenda.

From then on, the site kept getting slapped with infractions for stuff that is allowed on main stream news sites. What are we to say about this? The Daily Squib is above all these things, but still constrained under this censored Googleised Obama entity. Needless to say, we can’t wait till Obama leaves office and maybe the stranglehold will release a little, although we doubt that very much.

And what of the European Union? Satire, will be punished and free speech completely purged. This is one amongst many reasons why Britain must leave the EU if it wants to retain any semblance of a democracy and free speech. This is why the Squib will always fight for Britain to retain its sovereignty even resorting to factual data driven articles for the Brexit cause. Already in Germany satirists are being arrested and tried. This is what ‘free speech’ means in the EU.

A maverick publication like the Daily Squib does still exist today, in a place where the internet has changed for the worse. There is a glass ceiling, and there are now borders to the internet in its heavily controlled censored state, we fear free speech is being eroded, and it will get worse as time goes by. What are the answers? There are none, all there is is a libertarian anarchic spark saying Fuck You to the ones who wish to curtail free speech, to put borders on creativity and true expression, to cut down high art, to kill artists and stifle the truth. Fuck you with all the might of a million pens and paint brushes as you are nothing in the Universal Mind that powers everything.

When we say We, substitute with I, but understand that one person can write all the satirical stories, do all the artwork, design, and even deal with advertisers whilst pretending to be thousands of characters at the same time is hard work, but I will continue with the Daily Squib for as long as it takes to bring recognition to the satirical genre.

Satire serves a very important place in what is coming close to a contrived heavily censored Orwellian world, it is the last stand of democracy and freedom of expression and by cutting down satirical discourse Western civilisation is disappearing slowly down the plug hole into the sewer of totalitarianism.

Where is Sir Tim Berners-Lee now? The internet started off so beautifully, where everything was there, and anyone could say anything. Those heady days of the internet are all but a wonderful dream, now turned into a nightmare of protocols, of heavy regulation, censorship, anti-free speech and restrictive laws.

The Daily Squib is an equal opportunities satire breaking news newspaper and it dips its pen into everything, living, dead or zombified.

The Editor

Do You Think the DS Should Adopt Subscription Model?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Obama: “Would Americans Give Up Their Sovereignty to the EU?”

0

 

 

 

Would Americans agree to have their laws superseded by China?

Would Americans agree to be dictated to on whom they trade with?

Would Americans give up their military to another?

Would Americans accept an 18% increase in all consumer prices?

Would Americans agree to have their borders controlled by China?

The answer is an emphatic NO!

But, nevertheless, here is the TTIP pushing Obama coming to Britain to effectively ask it to surrender all control to Brussels during the EU referendum. To emasculate Britain, to eviscerate it, to kill off this nation once and for all. Once Britain is gone, that’s it, there’s no turning back, it will be gone forever.

There is no jingoistic fervour to the cause of leaving the EU, it is more of a matter of principle, of survival from a totalitarian state that controls every facet of our government. In fact, the EU has already infiltrated half the Conservative and Labour parties, and indoctrinated/bribed these people who are meant to be serving the UK. This form of invasive attack from within and without is a particularly nasty covert way of taking over control without a single shot being fired.

The Obama intervention by a lame-duck president, whose only achievement is that of adding $10 Trillion of debt to the United States with little to show for it, is a shameful legacy to behold, but that’s not all the US is liable for, the Federal unfunded liabilities now exceed $127 Trillion.

President Obama has been a disgrace to the United States and to global peace, under his tenure, the Ukraine was invaded by Russia. Under his tenure, the Middle East has descended into more turmoil and war, stoked by the Obama administration funding and arming elements that bring more conflict and terror to the region.

Mr. President, no one will listen to you, and you are a disgrace to the presidential office of the United States.

Don’t bother coming to the UK, no one wants your meddling reverse-Midas touch here, or anywhere else if possible.

 

Lord Lawson and Lord Owen: Princeton University Conference – Europe and the Challenges of Brexit

0

On EU integration, Lord Lawson said:

‘On the European mainland it has always been well understood that the whole purpose of European integration was political, and that economic integration was simply a means to a political end’.

‘Unfortunately, a fundamental contempt for democracy has always been one of the most striking and least attractive characteristics of the European integrationist movement, however noble its intentions.’

Turning to the single currency, the former Chancellor explained:

‘There is not a single major monetary union in the world that is not also a fiscal union and a political union. The economic and political logic is incontrovertible.’

‘But the coming into being of monetary union – and there can be no doubt of the determination of the leaders of Europe to persist with it at all costs – has fundamentally changed the nature of the European Union, and of non-Eurozone Britain’s relationship with it.’

Lord Lawson said of the UK’s relationship with the EU:

‘To be part of a political project whose objective we emphatically do not share cannot possibly make sense.’

‘We continue to be fully subject to the ever-growing corpus of EU legislation and regulation, all of it directed to the achievement of full political union.’

In conclusion, Lord Lawson stated:

‘Membership of the European Union, however well-intentioned, is an affront to self-government; and it offers nothing that remotely compensates for this.’

Lord Owen began his speech by outlining the choice for the British people:

‘When you are a member of a dysfunctional organisation like the EU that can neither reform nor restructure you have two choices: either to reluctantly remain in the organisation or be brave enough to leave.’

He stressed the importance of NATO in protecting our national security:

‘While the EU is dysfunctional NATO is not. NATO would benefit today from a solely committed British voice not one hovering between it and EU defence…A core priority after Brexit must be for the UK to strengthen NATO and help improve the Alliance’s capability to act cooperatively to preserve peace and security including dealing with ISIL.’

‘In Europe we are sleepwalking in relation to security questions and the situation is not stable.  There is no shadow of doubt that all European NATO member states should now increase their defence budgets as agreed two years ago…There must also in future be less talk about EU military defence in EU documents such as the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement, less talk about EU common defence, and a far greater European commitment to NATO, not just in words but in actions.

The former Foreign Secretary concluded:

Outside the EU, the UK has an unique opportunity to shield itself from a future collapse in the Eurozone by starting to negotiate global trading arrangements and improving our competitiveness and simultaneously demonstrating a greater commitment to NATO.’

EU Referendum: I’m IN the ****!

0

 

The EU is a failing enterprise that is un-democratic, corrupt and profligate, with a future akin to the Titanic.

Much like the famous ship which was said to be too big to sink, so too come the claims about the EU, and it is sinking in a sea of debt, unrealised pension debt liabilities as well as failing members like Greece.

The IN campaign are definitely in the sewer, a shit party full to the brim, directed from behind the scenes by cowardly unelected eurocrats hiding behind their curtain of deceit and greed. With their unlimited expense accounts, low tax rates and diamond plated pensions, of course the faceless unelected eurocrats have a lot to lose, so this is why they are now pouring huge amounts of your taxpayer money into propaganda drives to fool the people of Britain with your own money whilst laughing in your face.

Raw sewage

The campaigners and supporters of the Remain camp are low information people, they are not interested in the cold hard facts or the truth about the EU, they are enslaved by lies and false propaganda forced onto the populace by Project Fear and pledge allegiance to nothing but cowardice, betrayal and greed.

There is an almost robotic element to those who support to stay in the EU. Their fervour resembles the same Soviet pride of the former USSR, and the current communist state of China. No amount of reasoning or facts put in front of their faces, point by point telling them they have been told lies by their greed fuelled masters will assuage their singular urgency to sell Britain out and betray its people forever.

To fight this form of brainwashing and ulterior greed fuelled enemy is a task that is gargantuan in size, but a wholly manageable affair because the IN campaign may have the backing of Goldman Sachs and other EU departments, but it does not have half the passion or truth behind its operation. The truth always wins through, and the people can see through the lies the BSE team spout.

You are definitely IN, you are IN the Shit, and you know it.

KAjwhriuw024hvjbed2SORH