Abraham Lincoln Was Half Black Historians Reveal
WASHINGTON DC - USA - The sixteenth president of the United States of America, Abraham Lincoln has been discovered to have had a black father according to historians and scientists working for the Institute of Historical Science which is linked to Harvard university.
Records dating to February 12, 1809 officially remark that Abraham Lincoln's parents were Thomas Lincoln and Nancy Hanks, however, there has been a new discovery which has put a new slant on the issue of parentage.
Abraham Lincoln's mother was having an affair with a black plantation worker and new DNA evidence suggests that she somehow tricked her husband into believing that Abraham was the couples child. Secret love letters unearthed in 2003 reveal that Lincoln's mother was conducting a clandestine affair with a slave named Iemis from a Kentucky plantation.
"We managed to attain DNA evidence from a lock of Abraham Lincoln's hair which proves that he had a very strong African genetic link. His chromosome makeup is very specific to West African DNA patterns and this suggests that Abraham's real father was indeed of African origin," Dr. Alan Holdsworth, who is the chief Anthropologist on this project told National Geographic magazine.
The Obama campaign team, on hearing of the wonderful news have already started production of a short film to be aired on all networks next week.
Senator McCain's campaign team are of course trying to refute the evidence collated by the scientific researchers as false and have demanded the team re-do the DNA analysis of Abraham Lincoln's hair.
"Now we know why he was so vehemently opposed to slavery. Lincoln's father was a slave. His mother, a poor white farmer's wife had slept with a black slave and somehow concealed this fact from her husband. It's almost like something you would see on Jerry Springer or Maury," a reporter from the Fox News Network said.
With the prospect of another half black president on the way, America must come to terms with its past before it embraces its future.




SO WE ALL BLACK AT HEART EVEN WHITEY. YOU ALL GOT WHITE OVER TIME IN COLD CLIMATES UP NORTH SO STOP BITCHIN ABOUT RACE WE ALL BLEED THE SAME BLOOD
WHITE RACISTS YOUR ANCESTORS WERE BLACK......PERIOD!
JESUS WAS BLACK AS THE NIGHT HE HAD NEGRO HAIR AND DARK SKIN LIKE EBONY. THE PHAROAHS OF EGYPT WERE BLACK NUBIANS. HEBREWS AND JEWS CAME FROM AFRICA SO THEIR BLACK TOO.............
SO GET A LIFE CUZ WE ALL THE SAME GENE POOL NIGGA
i have been looking for kimberly dawn pryor for a long time. shewas our foster daughter when she was a baby. her birthday was june 1985. please let me know ifyou are her..
USA. The truth is out there, you can just google it.
If you are talking about the Mashiach (Messiah) Melekh Melākhīm (King of Kings) Melekh of Yisrael,
Jesus is not his name, that is the name of Greek god
The name for the Melekh Melākhīm (King of Kings) is Yahushua, which means Yah (Yahuwah-YHWH)
is my Redeemer.
What does the name Jesus means?
Nothing important in Hebrew, just a greek name.
My redeemer's name Is Yahushua the son of the Living Elohim, Yahuwah El Shaddai (The Almighty)
>the bible
>ishygddt
The more you know.
Marlio, the thought that people change color over time is ridiculous. That lie was perpetrated by the biggest piece of colonial racist propaganda, "The Theory of Evolution By Charles Darwin". People didn't change color due to the climate or develop different nose shapes due to their location. People back then were like people now, they moved around from place to place and intermixed with people of varying ethnicities. The mixing of different people brought about a change in physical features.
The lie that people changed over time from being in a new environment is the stupidest thing that I've ever heard. The only reason why his books were selling so quickly and so well received was because the helped the STORY that white men were at the top of the evolutionary chain. That somehow they were black a loooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnngggggggggggg time ago, but magically turned white over the years and deserve to reign as the supreme beings. *eye roll* That book was a giant ego trip and a lie.
Now, don't get me wrong..."evolution" (notice the lowercase 'e') is real. We had simple bacteria, now we have evolved, vaccine resistant viruses. Some butterflies had spots, now they're striped. But humans DID NOT come from apes or any ape-like beings and we DO NOT share a common ancestor (this is from 'The Theory of Evolution By Charles Darwin'). People use evolution these days to interchangeably denote both the scientific phenomenon and the racist propaganda. They are not one and the same.
If you don't believe me about people mixing with other ethnic groups, ask your asian grandfather, arab uncle, german mother, black irish dad. (I don't know if any of those ethnic groups apply to you, it's just to illustrate that in THIS VERY DAY AND AGE we are a product of ethnic mixing, so why would the people before us be any different?).
I just can't wait to see what lies the people come up with 200 years from now about the primitive people we were waaaaayyyyy back in 2012. Hah!
Today's standard of interbreeding is very novel from a historical perspective, and it is slowly leading to less drastic physical differences between people. Please try to read up on a subject before creating a ridiculous strawman version of the subject and attacking that.
You don't want to believe it but you would faint at the idea that George Washington had a biracial son with his slave Venus. Jefferson had a beautiful family with his slave Sally Heming. That President Warren Harding came from a mixed race family with blacks on both sides. You see, those powerful people back then were having sex, raped, and/or in relationships, surely creating children.
When you start hearing stories about there being relatives of color somewhere there's an oral history and you better start researching it because it is probably true.
There were black people in North America a thousand years before Columbus arrived so interracial marriages meant absolutely nothing back then. People intermarried, had families and lived fine. It wasn't until the Brits came over and wanted to oppress everybody who wasn't white to steal what they wanted. I'd recommend you find some true history books by Dr. James W. Loewen or historian J.A. Rogers. Or watch some of the documentaries put out by Dr. Henry Louis Gates, who's bringing the world of races together like never before.
At what length will the black man go to create an honorable/Important image for himself, it's sad, but true, the black man will never yield a crop, his destiny is already planed for him, it's revealed in the Old Testament, " The Sin Of Cain Against His Brother Able ", "The Cursed Race" !
(^_^)
PS - But I have no doubt that Abraham Lincoln was half black, "Lincoln" didn't yield a crop either, just look at the moral damage to our nation that he helped to create !
What Bible have you been reading?
I've read the Bible from Genesis to Revelations, and the Word of God implies no such thing.
In fact, if you read the Bible it doesn't discuss RACE not ONCE!
You no where racial discrimination comes from? the seeds of satan.
Bye Bye
"1492 goes down as the year that the entire planet was hoodwinked by the Roman Catholic Church. During Alexander VI's term the Christians were fighting the Holy Crusades against the so called infidels. The enemy that the church was fighting was the northward movement of Islam as far up into Europe as Germany. These Middle Eastern Islamics took control of Constantinopole in Turkey and threatened the stronghold that the Roman Empire and in turn the church had on the world at the time. Pope Alexander used the age old tactic of discrediting an opponent to weaken his position. One major obstacle that faced Alexander and the church was the fact that Jesus, who their entire religion was based on was physically the same as the Islamics that they were fighting against. He was represented in all paintings, carvings and sculptures as the dark skinned man of Middle Eastern origin that he was. Nazareth certainly was in the Middle Eastern area that later came under the influence of Islam. How could they possibly convince their constituency of the wickedness of the enemy when their own messiah looked like them? Although the original Christians were certainly Middle Eastern people of color, by the time Alexander ascended to the papacy, Europeans had long taken control of the church. Pope Alexander VI's solution was to have every image of the real Jesus destroyed and literally had the Vatican gutted and redone. He commissioned Leonardo Di Vinci to recast Jesus in the image of his son Cesare Borgia with the express intent of passing off historical Jesus as European in appearance. To this day, there are armed guards stationed around the clock at the entrances of the catacombs to keep anyone from viewing the original wall carvings of Jesus in his legitimate ethnic representation."
Don't Christians realize that the images they have in their chuches and homes are portraits of Cesare Borgia?
Post your comment