17.7 C
London
Sunday, July 12, 2026
secret satire society
Home Blog Page 488

Juncker: “Britisher Deserters Vill Be Shot on Sight”

Mr. Charrington
-
3
Juncker: “Britisher Deserters Vill Be Shot on Sight”

Jean Claude Juncker has threatened Britain once again with another comment about Brexit:

“If the British should say No, which I hope they don’t, then life in the EU will not go on as before,” he said. “The United Kingdom will have to accept being regarded as a third country, which won’t be handled with kid gloves.

“If the British leave Europe, people will have to FACE THE CONSEQUENCES — we will have to, just as they will. It’s not a threat but our relations will no longer be what they are today.”

Jean Claude Juncker’s father was a member of Hitler’s Nazi army and fought the Russians during the invasion of Russia in World War II. His wife’s father, Louis Mathias Frising, was one of Hitler’s Propaganda Commissars, and was among those responsible for the Germanification of Juncker’s home country of Luxembourg. He also helped enforce the Nuremburg Laws that stripped Jews of their rights, and were a precursor to the Holocaust.

It is therefore, quite normal behaviour for someone like Juncker to act in an authoritarian fascistic manner as he is doing now by threatening Britons.

The EU has been orchestrating an organised terror campaign through the media called ‘Project Fear’ and it does not seem to be working very well.

Luvvie EU Parade Smacks of Corporatism, Hypocrisy and is Anti-Art

Mr. Charrington
-
5
Luvvie EU Parade Smacks of Corporatism, Hypocrisy and is Anti-Art

Who says an artist cannot create outside the EU?

Certainly the Beatles and the Stones had no problems creating their music outside the European Union.

Naturally the Cameron pro-EU corporates have brought out the celebrities and luvvie media whores to tout the EU, when it is a fact that these people most probably have no knowledge about the European Union or what it does to nations or their people.

Does some bamboozled celebritard luvvie know or even care that TTIP will kill off the NHS and privatise it? No, because said celebrity gets the best private healthcare and does not care what the plebs have to deal with.

Does some corporate controlled luvvie care that millions more people will flood Britain if we remain in the EU? Of course not, if you have a penthouse and numerous mansions in the Hollywood Hills, where you don’t mix with the lowly people, why would you care?

Does the remain touting celebrity know that the UK has to send £350 million per week to Brussels with little return? Probably not, and frankly they do not care less as long as they live their pampered lives in the cosy fantasy limelight of ego driven corporate funded dreams.

What about the evisceration of national sovereignty and ability to govern oneself under our own laws? Why would a pampered celebrity even care about such a thing? They are more concerned with trivialities and shallow pleasantries within their plastic self-obsessed lives.

One must also take into account that celebrities and film starlets are not real artists, even though they may sometimes be called that. They are merely corporate slaves wheeled out to affirm whatever corporate whim is in the news at the time.

Government Admits TTIP is Threat to Our NHS

Mr. Charrington
-
2
Government Admits TTIP is Threat to Our NHS

Commenting on the Government’s humiliating climbdown over the omission of protecting the NHS in the Queen’s speech, Steve Baker MP Conservative member for Wycombe said:

‘The Government has today admitted that the EU is a threat to our NHS. The only way we can protect the NHS from TTIP is if we Vote Leave on 23 June.’

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a trade deal being orchestrated between the EU and the US. The clandestine project has been formulated in deep secrecy, and will seek to eventually privatise the NHS if the UK remains in the EU.

TTIP seeks to reduce the regulatory barriers to trade for big business, food safety law, environmental legislation, banking regulations, health care and the sovereign powers of individual nations. The primary aim of TTIP is to open up Europe’s public health, education and water services to US companies. This will most certainly mean the privatisation of the NHS.

David Cameron and George Osborne, are championing the TTIP deal because it will mean the costly NHS will become a business, and bring lucrative deals to the corporate bosses. This essentially means the NHS will have to be a paid for service and no longer ‘free’.

Although the Government’s StrongerIn campaign have claimed there is no danger to the NHS, they are covering up the finite details of the complicated TTIP contract which the UK will be forced to adhere to if we remain in the EU.

nhs corridor

If we remain in the inhibitive EU, big corporations from America and the continent will have a free-for-all with the spoils of the NHS. This would effectively mean certain branches of the NHS will be privatised and because the UK would be tied into the EU, there would be no recourse to eventually privatising the entire National Health Service. Successive governments would have no powers to repeal TTIP or to reverse the deal bringing the NHS back into public ownership.

This is why, the only way to save our NHS is to Vote Leave on June 23. If you vote remain, then the NHS will eventually be privatised and Britain will lose its greatest asset.

For the sake of future generations, your family’s health, your children and grandchildren, you must vote to leave. The consequences are too grave to think otherwise. Let us take back control of Britain, and stop sending £350 million to Brussels each week for little or no return.

Italy Debt 132% of GDP at €2.229 Trillion

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Italy Debt 132% of GDP at €2.229 Trillion

Italy’s debt now exceeds last year’s May record of €2.218 trillion despite government forecasts that have set-out a path lower from 2016 when public debt is forecast to fall down to 131.4%, then 127.9% in 2017 and 123.7% in 2018.

Italy is on the brink of disaster and if Britain remains in the failing EU it will be stuck with not only an Italian economic debt implosion but a Spanish and Greek one.

By remaining in the EU, the UK will eventually be liable to the debt of all the failing eurozone economies. Ever closer union will be foisted on Britain as David Cameron lost Britain’s last bargaining veto during his faux EU negotiation farce.

Britain will be forced to join the euro currency and scrapping the pound will condemn the UK to economic purgatory inside a doomed eurozone.

We must Vote Leave on June 23 or risk being sucked into the eurozone black hole of economic catastrophe and assured destruction.

 

Priti Patel: Brussels Works for Big Business, Not the British People

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Priti Patel: Brussels Works for Big Business, Not the British People

 

 

Commenting on a letter in The Financial Times from multinational firms which together spend between €15.3 million and €17.65 million lobbying the European Commission,  Priti Patel MP said:

 

‘The EU works for big, foreign multinational companies but it doesn’t work for the British people who have to pay Brussels £350 million every week.

 

‘Of course Brussels is good for big businesses and fat cats who care about their bonuses – they can afford to spend huge amounts of money on lobbyists and lawyers to help them stitch up the rules. But it is bad for smaller businesses and entrepreneurs.

 

‘The British people will not be browbeaten into making a choice against their interests on 23 June. If we Vote Leave, we can take back control of our economy, democracy and borders.’

 

Corruption And Bribery

 

These giant multinationals spend between €15.3 million and €17.65 million lobbying the European Commission.

In 2015, Airbus spent between €1,750,000 and €1,999,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2015, Bloomberg spent between €100,000 and €199,999 employing consultant lobbyists to lobby the Commission.

In 2015, Cisco spent between €1,000,000 and €1,249,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2014, GE spent between €3,000,000 and €3,249,999 lobbying the Commission.

Between April 2014 and March 2015, Hitachi spent between €1,000,000 and €1,249,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2014, Liberty Global spent between €1,000,000 and €1,249,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2015, Mars spent between €400,000 and €499,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2015, Ford spent between €500,000 and €599,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2014, the Carlyle Group spent between €200,000 and €299,999 lobbying the Commission.

In 2015, Caterpillar spent between €400,000 and €499,999 on lobbying the Commission.

In 2015, Hutchison spent between €200,000 and €299,999 lobbying the Commission.

IBM spent between €1,500,000 and €1,749,000 lobbying the Commission.

Between July 2014 and June 2015, Microsoft spent between €4,250,000 and €4,499,999 lobbying the European Commission.

Serious questions have been raised about the propriety of these companies.

Bloomberg was involved in a huge scandal when it was revealed that over 10,000 private messages sent via Bloomberg terminals were intentionally leaked.

Microsoft has been embroiled in a huge political scandal and criminal investigation in Romania. This involved a bribe and money laundering system, allowing the state to circumvent public auctions for IT services and allowed Microsoft to sell their licenses for their operating systems at elevated prices to the state through a third party.

It was recently revealed that the culture at Microsoft UK was toxic, with the media describing ‘lewd behaviour, heavy drinking and sexism at its UK division’.

Lord Howard: Lack of Democracy in EU Hurting Business

Mr. Charrington
-
0

 

 

Critical of the CBI’s record on the EU

‘In 1987 the CBI called for full UK membership of the European Monetary System. British membership of the ERM led to interest rates hitting 15% in 1992 and millions of homeowners going into negative equity. After the UK crashed out of the ERM in September 1992, on Black or White Wednesday, depending on your outlook, it enjoyed a sustained period of economic growth.

‘And in 1999, the CBI argued that joining the Euro would “deliver significant benefits to the UK economy”, including allowing British companies” to participate fully in a more complete and competitive single market” ( Sound Familiar ? ).

‘And there were dire predictions that, if we didn’t join, inward investment would dry up and the City would lose its place as a leading financial centre.

The arguments are all too familiar.’

 

Lack of democracy in the EU is hurting business

‘But if a government, having made its promises to the electors, is unable to keep those promises, not as a result of any conscious decisions on its part but as a result of the decision of some extraneous unaccountable body, such as the unelected European Commission or the unaccountable European Court of Justice, that crucial connection is broken. The lever which gives our people control doesn’t work.’

‘And because that increases the feeling of alienation which I described earlier it is a threat to us all, including business.’

 

The European Court of Justice has made us less safe

‘It is further increased by decisions of the European Court of Justice which make us less safe than we would otherwise be.

‘Among many such decisions, the Court has ruled that the Home Secretary is not allowed to refuse entry, or to deport, citizens of European countries who our courts have concluded are involved in terrorism.’

 

The CBI are ‘citizens of our country as well as businessmen and women.’

‘You are citizens of our country as well as businessmen and women.’

You want to be safe just as the rest of us do. And if you cannot carry out your business in a safe environment you will suffer the consequences, as business people as well as citizens.’

 

Set out the economic gains of a Vote to Leave

‘At the moment, every UK business must comply with “single market” legislation, even though just 5% of British firms export to the EU. This is a system which has an inherent tendency to produce disproportionate burdens on small companies, impeding their competitiveness.

‘And if we Vote Leave we can take back the power to make our own trade agreements. At the moment we have no trade deals with India, China, Brazil-or even Australia and New Zealand. We have to wait for 27 other member states to agree before we can arrange a single trade deal.

‘And to those who say that that trade with the EU will fall off a cliff if we leave I commend the words of the Prime Minister.  “If we were outside the EU altogether…” he said “….of course the trading would go on.

‘You could look at it this way.

‘If we left the EU with no trade deal-inconceivable given the tariff free zone from Iceland to Turkey- our exports would face EU tariffs averaging just 2.4%. But our net contribution to the EU budget is equivalent to a 7% tariff. Paying 7% to avoid 2.4% is mis-selling on a scale that dwarfs the scandal of PPI.’

Most New Jobs in the Last Year Went to EU Nationals

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Most New Jobs in the Last Year Went to EU Nationals

 

 

 

Commenting on the publication of the latest UK Labour Market statistics by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), Iain Duncan Smith MP said:

 

‘Our labour market is thriving, but it’s notable that more than three quarters of the rise in employment over the last year has come from people born abroad.

‘The truth is that it is Brits on low pay – and those out of work – who feel the consequences of uncontrolled migration. They are forced to compete with millions of people from abroad for jobs, and they suffer downward pressure on their wages.

‘The only way to take back control of our borders, economy and democracy is to Vote Leave on 23 June. That way we can have a fair migration policy that allows us to bring in the skills we need while investing in home-grown talent. A Vote to Leave also means we can take back control of the £350 million we hand to Brussels every week, and spend it on our priorities instead.’

 

The number of EU nationals working in the UK has increased by 224,001 in the last year alone, the equivalent of a city the size of Portsmouth.

 

The figures show that the number of EU nationals working in the UK in the first quarter of 2016 was 2,145,686. This is an increase of 93,726 from the last quarter of 2015 and an increase of 224,001 from a year ago. The annual increase is the equivalent of a city the size of Portsmouth.

The number of EU citizens working in the UK is up from 1,091,731 from the first quarter of 2010, an increase of 1,053,955 (ONS, 18 May 2016, link). This is the equivalent of a city the size of Birmingham.

The rate at which EU citizens are being added to the workforce is increasing. Between the first quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, just 24,291 EU citizens were added to the workforce.

As the ONS states ‘the number of non-UK nationals from outside the EU working in the UK has been broadly flat but the number of non-UK nationals from EU countries working in the UK has continued to increase’.

eu employment uk

Most new jobs in the last year went to EU nationals. The ONS explicitly states this is linked to the EU accessions.

 

The ONS states that in the last year, ‘UK nationals working in the UK increased by 185,000 to 28.15 million… non-UK nationals working in the UK increased by 229,000 to 3.34 million‘.

This means that 55.3% of new jobs went to non-UK nationals. The overwhelming majority of the increase was due to EU citizens. 54% of the total increase was due to EU citizens.

The ONS states that ‘Looking at changes in non-UK nationals working in the UK between January to March 1997 (when comparable records began) and January to March 2016: the number of non-UK nationals working in the UK increased from 928,000 to 3.34 million… the proportion of all people working in the UK accounted for by non-UK nationals increased from 3.5% to 10.6%… this increase in non-UK nationals working in the UK reflects the admission of several new member states to the European Union (EU)’.

412,000 persons were added to the UK workforce in the last year. 94,000 were born in the UK (22.91%). The remainder were born outside the UK, including 252,000 born in the rest of the EU.

 

Unemployment and the claimant count are falling: the Government’s claims about the impact of the referendum are falling apart.

 

The ONS states that: ‘The unemployment rate for those aged 16 and over for January to March 2016 was 5.1%. This was: unchanged compared with October to December 2015 [and] down from a year earlier (5.6%)’.

The Government previously claimed that rises in unemployment were down to the EU referendum and the fear of a leave vote. Despite the polls remaining constant, there has now been a decline in unemployment – this is embarrassing for the Government.

The claimant count is also falling. The ONS states that: ‘For April 2016 there were 737,800 people claiming unemployment related benefits. This was: 2,400 fewer than for March 2016 [and] 57,600 fewer than for a year earlier’.

The number of vacancies is rising year on year. The ONS states that ‘The number of vacancies for February to April 2016 was 13,000 more than for a year earlier’. The Education Secretary, Nicky Morgan, has claimed: ‘firms are already cutting back on advertising jobs because of their fear of a Brexit’.

Ex HSBC CEO Comments on Leaked Serco Letter to PM During EU ‘Renegotiation’

Mr. Charrington
-
0
Ex HSBC CEO Comments on Leaked Serco Letter to PM During EU ‘Renegotiation’

 

 

READ FULL LEAKED SERCO SOAMES TO PM LETTER HERE

 

Commenting on the leaked letter from the head of Serco to David Cameron, Michael Geoghegan (ex CEO of HSBC) said:

‘It’s laughable, and very telling, that No10 won’t comment on this correspondence.

‘The reality is that the whole re-negotiation of the U.K relationship with Europe – on which this government won the general election – is beginning to show all the hallmarks of a complete sham.

‘All of Europe knows it, and for the Prime Minister to continue to pretend otherwise runs the risk that the British People will lose confidence in the integrity of this government. I know from my time in the city that there is extreme pressure from the establishment to stay quiet on these occasions – but there is a limit.

‘The reality is the the CEOs of the banks know all too well that the weakness of Sterling has nothing to do with Brexit and all to do with the financial markets lack of confidence in investing in UK based on the Government’s track record to date.The Governor may well be right, interests rates may well go up but not because of Brexit but because as the Governor has said before UK relies on foreigners to fund its ever increasing debts and they already don’t like the trends they are seeing in the economy and they certainly won’t like now the slightest whiff of duplicity. For this reason alone it is vital that the Prime Minister comes completely clean and explains whether he did or did not negotiate in the true negotiating commitments that he got elected on.’

The EU Schengen Zone Encourages ISIS, ISIL

Mr. Charrington
-
1
The EU Schengen Zone Encourages ISIS, ISIL

Already, according to the EU’s own Frontex group, ISIS have infiltrated the EU’s celebrated Schengen zone. There are an estimated 5,000 Jihadi cells waiting within Europe right now, and things are going to get a lot worse thanks to the caught-in-the-headlights EU leaders who are dismissing the danger just to keep the failed project limping along.

EU Free Movement Zone For Terrorists

What the EU is doing, is endangering its own citizens’ lives so that they can keep their little vanity project up and running, and because of this, there will inevitably be further attacks like Paris and Brussels.

The Syrian crisis has been utilised by Jihadis using false passports and documents to move people into the EU. Once in at any port of entry, they have free movement to any city within Europe and possibly Britain. The Paris attacks were proof of this when forged documents from Syria were found on the attackers.

‘Dodgy’ Dave

The PM, David Cameron is knowingly misleading the British public when he says that ‘leaving the EU will encourage ISIS’, on the contrary, remaining in the EU will inevitably lead to further closer union in the EU for Britain, as well as adopting the euro currency, Britain will have to completely open the borders of the UK and join Schengen fully. This will increase danger to the UK and its citizens ten fold, as well as increase gun smuggling and weapons through Britain’s porous borders. With free visa travel from Turkey’s borders to the UK, the terrorists will flow in from the war zones.

Even Remain’s Theresa May has questioned Cameron’s reckless disregard for security.

What the Remain camp wants is the abolishment of Britain’s borders completely, flooding Britain with migrants at a pace never before witnessed. This action alone, is probably a terrorists dream, and David Cameron knows it, he is willingly endangering the lives of UK citizens, purely for his EU centric dodgy deals with corrupt business owners.

If you vote remain in EU, you not only sell out Britain but you open the country up to more terrorism from the EU’s porous borders. ISIS will champion you for voting to remain in the EU because it will make it easier for them to attack Britain, especially after all control of our country has been ceded to Brussels. Slow to act in any emergency situation, Brussels is a danger to itself, as much as ISIS is a danger to the EU.

Constitutional Crime: David Cameron Deliberately Misled Parliament

Mr. Charrington
-
1
Constitutional Crime: David Cameron Deliberately Misled Parliament

The Prime Minister has committed the highest constitutional crime by deliberately misleading parliament during his make-believe EU negotiations.

Under Britain’s constitution, misleading parliament is the knowing contempt of parliament and ministers are punished with expulsion from their post and party. In the 1960s the Profumo affair was instrumental in bringing down the government of Harold MacMillan.

READ FULL LEAKED SERCO SOAMES TO PM LETTER HERE

There is no trust in David Cameron any more, not among the people or the House.

The leaked Serco letter is proof that David Cameron not only misled the people during his little EU negotiation charade, but he also misled parliament by holding an EU Referendum whilst cynically making dodgy deals with corrupt business leaders behind everyone’s back.

Cameron’s EU renegotiation bid was ‘fiction’ as he had already decided to campaign for a remain vote.

The secret ‘mobilisation’ plan involved asking FTSE 500 companies to put in their annual reports warnings about the dangers of Brexit.

The strategy was discussed in a letter from Serco boss Rupert Soames to Mr Cameron 11 days before the latter’s renegotiation deal with the EU was complete. This followed a meeting a few days earlier.

The PM had been telling the Commons that he ‘ruled nothing out’ unless he won concessions from the EU.

There is no going back now in trust. David Cameron is in contempt of the constitution and parliament with his blatant lies and corrupt behaviour.

He only has one alternative now and that is to resign immediately pending a serious investigation into his misconduct.

“The procedure for expulsion is that a motion is moved, generally by the Leader of the House, “that … be expelled from this House”. It is customary, depending on the circumstances, that a Member be ordered to attend to offer an explanation. However, if it is apparent that no possible excuse could be given, then the order to attend is not made.

“Should the Member be already in prison for the offence, then the prison governor may be ordered to bring the Member before the House: however in the case of Mr Baker (see below) no order for attendance was made. An expelled Member may seek re-election to the House, even within the term of the same Parliament that elected him, a principle established in 1782 as a result of the case of John Wilkes, who was expelled three times and once had his return amended in favour of his defeated opponent.

“There have been three instances this century of expulsion: Horatio Bottomley (Independent, South Hackney), was expelled in August 1922, after being convicted of fraudulent conversion of property and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.

“Garry Allighan (Labour, Gravesend) was expelled on 30 October 1947, for lying to a committee and for gross contempt of the House after publication of an article in the World’s Press News accusing Members of insobriety and of taking fees or bribes for the supply of information.

“Peter Baker (Conservative, South Norfolk) was expelled on 16 December 1954, after being sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for forgery. In this instance, the motion for expulsion need not have been moved: under the provisions then still in force of the Forfeiture Act 1870, he would have been automatically disqualified.

“These provisions were amended by the Criminal Law Act 1967. A person convicted of treason is disqualified for election to, or if already a Member of sitting and voting in, the House or its Committees. (Forfeiture Act 1870, amended by the Criminal Law Act 1967). This disqualification remains in force until either the sentence has expired or a pardon has been granted.

“The provisions of the Forfeiture Act have only once been invoked. In 1903 Arthur Lynch (Nationalist, Galway City) was convicted of high treason for fighting against the Crown in the Boer War. The House was advised by the then Attorney General (Sir Robert Findlay), that as Mr Lynch was automatically disqualified by the Forfeiture Act, it was not necessary for the House either to consider the judgement or move a motion for expulsion. Instead the House immediately proceeded to discuss and move a motion for a new writ for a by-election (see HC Deb, 4th Series, vol 118, c1121 1148, 2 March 1903). Lynch’s sentence to death was commuted to penal servitude for life. He was released on licence in 1904 and received a free pardon from the Crown in 1907. He returned to the House as Member for West Clare in 1909, until his retirement in 1918. He unsuccessfully contested Battersea South for Labour at the 1918 General Election.

“Members may of course be de-selected by their constituency or national party, or asked to resign immediately according to the practice of the parties concerned. The parliamentary party may withdraw the whip, which effectively isolates a Member from the party machinery within the House, or indeed expel the Member from the Party.

“The most recent occurrence of this was the expulsion of the Member for Brent East (Mr Ken Livingstone) from the Labour Party for standing as an independent in the election for London Mayor. A Member does not lose his or her seat as a result and continues to sit, either as an independent, or as a Member of a different political party if they so choose.”

 

1...487488489...823Page 488 of 823
squib footer 270

Breaking News

Copyright © Daily Squib 2026.

The Daily Squib is a curious satirical parody newspaper offering breaking news, political satire, comedy, investigative journalism, opinion and celebrity news.

KAjwhriuw024hvjbed2SORH