We have seen it time after time – election promises – nothing changes. The same two-party system where each supposedly opposing political party is fundamentally part of the same system, the same apparatchiks, the same governmental offices, and the same underlying modus operandi. Voting in elections means that the population is duped each time, peddled with false hope and tricked into believing that there is some type of “democracy” in play when, in reality, there is little or none. Both parties are two sides of the same coin. In Western nations that are supposedly “democratic”, the lie has been peddled for too long, and some people are awakening to this ongoing lie. Democracy does not exist when the machinery of the system remains unchanged for whoever is supposedly elected. True change only comes from a majority movement of a population, not false “democratic” elections where the apparatus of a system remains despite supposed opposing political parties being voted in.
Defining “true change” is simple. It means a fundamental shift in power and the accountability mechanisms that govern power. In this respect, those who hold office emphasise shared gains in security, prosperity and personal agency rather than primarily serving themselves and a narrow establishment within an unmovable system. Deep reform of institutions that are constantly updated and realigned with the population’s interests in prominence and a fundamental shift through thorough transformation.
True change does, however, not come from a small section of the population showing their discontent with rioting or civil unrest; it must come from the majority of the population of any nation. Only if the numbers of protesters involve the majority of a population can true change occur. This population element should also include members of the armed forces and police apparatus who align themselves and their allegiance with the population.
The administration or “establishment” within nations is small in number. The civilian population of nations is large. This is why numbers in any movement count. To effectively create an element of true change, the entire population must be mobilised to effect this change.
Where numbers of participants in true change count, there is also an element that governments utilise to safeguard themselves from true change. This is called “division”; by fracturing populations by employing multiple techniques, the ruling factions can split allegiances and “divide and conquer”. Utilising this element of “splitting” ensures that the population does not work with a singular motivational factor but are instead fractured. Dividing populations makes them easier to control by encouraging each faction to fight each other and not the common cause of implementing true change.
To implement true change — everyone must be involved in the movement, or a majority of the population, at least over 80%.
What is happening in France at the moment with the so-called student riots is a tiny fraction of the energy required to implement change. These “student riots” make up less than 1% of the population, and even though they are being funded and organised by NGOs and billionaires like Neville Roy Singham/Soros, who are aligned with the Chinese Communist Party and the communist political ideology, the movement is effectively moot.
It is a good thing that populations within Western nations are so fractured politically, in religion, in class, in race and in wealth. This is the sole best defence for any current administration in a Western nation. If, however, the entire population united as one force — this would be a scary time for the administrations.
True change comes only from one large population movement in its entirety, enforcing change through decisive action.
