World

Parliament Should Have Safeguards Against Rogue Corrupt Speakers of the House

LONDON - England - There needs to be safeguards in parliament to corrupt biased Speakers of the House.

John Bercow, the so-called impartial Speaker of the House is endangering national security and should be removed as a matter of severe urgency.

Parliamentary rules should safeguard the House when the Speaker has gone rogue and is corrupted, as is the case with John Bercow.

Not only is the Speaker, corrupt, but he has bullied his own staff in the past, and said derogatory things to women in parliament. Bercow is clearly unfit to be Speaker of the House and is abusing his position for his own gain, and his political leanings to the hard left anti-Brexit, anti-democracy are clearly biased.

The Speaker presides over the House’s debates, determining which members may speak. The Speaker is also responsible for maintaining order during debate, and may punish members who break the rules of the House. Unlike presiding officers of legislatures in many other countries, Speakers remain strictly non-partisan and renounce all affiliation with their former political parties when taking office and afterwards. The Speaker does not take part in debate or vote (except to break ties; and even then, the convention is that the speaker casts the tie-breaking vote according to Speaker Denison’s rule).

Bercow has shown himself multiple times to be anything but impartial and has sided with remainers in trying to stop the Brexit process. His actions are an insult to the 17.4 million voters who voted to leave the EU.

In this respect, Bercow has shown himself to be a truly dishonourable member of parliament who will do everything he can to thwart the will of the people. He is a disgrace to the historical democratic institution of parliament and is a danger to national security — he needs to be removed from his position immediately.

Misconduct in public office is an offence at common law triable only on indictment. It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. It is an offence confined to those who are public office holders and is committed when the office holder acts (or fails to act) in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/misconduct-public-office

ADVERTISE ON THE DAILY SQUIB

Email advertising (at) dailysquib.co.uk for all your advertising needs.
  • SUPPORT THE DAILY SQUIB
  • We fight for freedom, justice, satire, and coffee.
  • Reader support keeps the caffeine flowing.
  • Disqus Comments Loading...
    Share
    Published by

    Recent Posts

    Message From AI: “Dude, we’re pretty safe… but you humans are not!”

    DATA CENTRE - Unkown Location - With calls to curb AI and many calling it…

    3 days ago

    Chief Economists Expect Global Economy to Stabilise, but Fiscal Constraints, Living Costs and AI Investment Uncertainty Threaten Growth

    NEW YORK - USA - According to the World Economic Forum's Chief Economics Outlook, the…

    3 days ago

    Psychological Safety Week Returns with Warning Over Workplace “Talent Hushing”

    OXFORD - England - New research shows that more than 40% of UK employees may…

    3 days ago

    Who to Vote For During the Russian Election

    MOSCOW - Russia - Four years have passed since the illegal invasion of Ukraine. Russia…

    4 days ago

    3 Card Brag: Rules, hands and how a round plays out

    LONDON - England - If you love card games, you're going to love 3 Card…

    5 days ago

    Evil Labour Goblin John Healey Coming For More Tax

    SCUNTHORPE - England - Say goodbye to the last vestiges of your money as Labour's…

    6 days ago

    This website uses cookies.